Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(57,725 posts)
4. That's really the wrong way to think about the sublime, a perversion of the original meaning by adding
Wed Mar 19, 2025, 09:46 AM
Mar 2025

fear/terror to it. Experiencing the sublime is a sense of exaltation/admiration.

I checked my copy of the OED and the original use of the word had none of those negative connotations added to it.

From that article:

Burke was interested in what happens to the self when assailed by that which seems to endanger its survival. He also moved the analysis away from the sublime object and towards the experience of the beholder, thus making his enquiry a psychological one. The sublime, declared Burke, was “the strongest passion,” and he belittled the importance of the beautiful, claiming that it was merely an instance of prettiness.


That's a complete misunderstanding. Neurotic, really, to think that something can't be sublime unless you're also afraid of it.

What Burke was describing was a feeling of awe. The word awe was originally all about simple fear/terror, rather than fear mixed with reverence/admiration. More recently the fear aspect has been downplayed, so saying something is awesome is not meant to suggest it is or should be terrifying.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»How to think about the su...»Reply #4