Latest Breaking News

walkingman

(11,300 posts)

6. Who gets to decide who is a "Democrat"....easy answer, the voters. ☮

Reply to AZLD4Candidate (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:38 PM

20 hrs ago

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

17 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Americanme The Polack MSgt reACTIONary Multichromatic kcoates Unwind Your Mind ActRaiser Bakerboy17 buzzycrumbhunger Attilatheblond KPN electric_blue68 NEOH rampartd UniqueUserName Cobalt Violet PrivateTrumpHater

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Carville says he wouldn't seat Mamdani-backed Avila Chevalier in caucus: 'She's not a Democrat' [View all] AZLD4Candidate 21 hrs ago OP

So James Carville says Avila Chevalier is NOT a D.I.N.O. , Good dave99 21 hrs ago #1

Maybe he is saying... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #18

The gatekeepers are on full display today. choie 21 hrs ago #2

Carville needs to go F himself. The voters are clearly smarter than he is. They know what they want. flashman13 18 hrs ago #23

Who's this James Carville guy?? InAbLuEsTaTe 16 hrs ago #30

Carville is a Democratic "consultant" that has been working on campaigns since the 1980s. flashman13 4 hrs ago #68

Reason #117 Miguelito Loveless 21 hrs ago #3

Can Carville actually do this or is he just blowing smoke? DBoon 20 hrs ago #4

He is sharing his opinion and... reACTIONary 20 hrs ago #14

No RandySF 9 hrs ago #55

tangential correction/clarification (whether full House could refuse to seat her) GJGCA 6 hrs ago #66

Her views may be closer to the FDR Democrats than his karynnj 20 hrs ago #5

She previously called for abolishing police, prisons and borders MichMan 8 hrs ago #59

Completely agree on those issues karynnj 7 hrs ago #65

Who gets to decide who is a "Democrat"....easy answer, the voters. ☮ walkingman 20 hrs ago #6

No true Scotsman.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #15

And Carville is relevant how? ananda 20 hrs ago #7

He's on TV. He's being quoted.. reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #16

And as far as I can tell.. ananda 17 hrs ago #25

Who the heck are you calling a Republican? In truth... reACTIONary 3 hrs ago #69

Yeah, Carville? Ain't yer call anyway ya pinhead duckworth969 20 hrs ago #8

Hey Carville how about Fetterman? Ritabert 20 hrs ago #9

While we're at it lets list all the places I wouldn't seat Mary Matalin ToxMarz 20 hrs ago #10

We need numbers in the House SpankMe 20 hrs ago #11

is she too radical for the "squad?" rampartd 9 hrs ago #52

There is no change in numbers MichMan 8 hrs ago #61

leaving out the part where mopinko 20 hrs ago #12

Bernie caucuses with the Democratic party doesn't he? Laffy Kat 20 hrs ago #13

Yep! But.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #17

We've got FOUR months to NOT fuck up NOV. Her winning wont help. Callie1979 19 hrs ago #19

Isn't there some kind of rule about not trashing Democrats? luv2fly 18 hrs ago #24

If the post quotes or paraphrases the person, it is not a violation of the policy. I am left of the Socialist Dems. My 3Hotdogs 17 hrs ago #26

Not seeing any quote marks luv2fly 16 hrs ago #27

Paraphrases? Do you or the original pster have sources that verify the "paraphrase" (it wasn't a quote)? I mean, if KPN 14 hrs ago #45

Unfortunately, my source was the reporting on WNYC the morning on Wednesday. She has also promoted fully 3Hotdogs 9 hrs ago #56

How do you like your Governor? SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #51

It's not just you. murielm99 15 hrs ago #36

Not sure anymore MichMan 7 hrs ago #63

She's against prisons and borders creeksneakers2 15 hrs ago #39

Sources? KPN 14 hrs ago #43

Sources? KPN 14 hrs ago #42

Here from Post #54 MichMan 8 hrs ago #60

Thanks. Fortunately, I don't have the ability to vote for or against her, so I don't have to research further. I would KPN 2 hrs ago #71

Back into the dustbin of history you go. Buddyzbuddy 19 hrs ago #20

That's nice, James. Scrivener7 19 hrs ago #21

Post removed Post removed 18 hrs ago #22

It's not 1992 anymore, you chicken-fried buffoon . . . hatrack 16 hrs ago #28

She called Biden a "rapist" in 2020. RandySF 16 hrs ago #29

Proof? VegasVet 16 hrs ago #31

NYT RandySF 16 hrs ago #32

Thank you for this. Wow. She's a bit much for my taste if this is still what she believes. VegasVet 13 hrs ago #46

Google.com awesomerwb1 14 hrs ago #40

No. Someone made a statement. It isn't unreasonable to ask for proof. Don't be obtuse. VegasVet 13 hrs ago #47

Put more effort into it. It's easy awesomerwb1 5 hrs ago #67

Carville is DLC in other words, corporate owned PurgedVoter 15 hrs ago #33

Who last hired him? Akakoji 15 hrs ago #34

Maybe he should actually talk to her instead of letting tweets some decades old influence him. Eko 15 hrs ago #35

Carville can eat a bag AllyCat 15 hrs ago #37

Post removed Post removed 15 hrs ago #38

"looney progressives" luv2fly 14 hrs ago #41

Could you provide us with some authentic quotes from her . . . RedArkGuy 13 hrs ago #49

The evidence is in the strawman over there. . .wait, it moved over there, passed another goalpost AZLD4Candidate 8 hrs ago #58

See link in post #54 MichMan 7 hrs ago #64

Far past the time for Carville to retire from politics. PufPuf23 14 hrs ago #44

I keep asking people who are having McCarthyite fits RedArkGuy 13 hrs ago #48

"democratic socialist" J_William_Ryan 10 hrs ago #50

Libertarians are definitely not Republicans. While they may share an overall view on minimalist government, Libertarians 24601 2 hrs ago #72

She sought the democratic nomination JBTaurus83 9 hrs ago #53

She didn't seem to like interracial relationships at one point. RandySF 9 hrs ago #54

how is Carville still a thing? he must have one hell of an agent. nt Javaman 8 hrs ago #57

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy... GiqueCee 8 hrs ago #62

Carville needs to retire his opinions. NOW. howardmappel 2 hrs ago #70