Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all]Mysterian
(6,704 posts)37. LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation?
These fools and liars would be comical were it not for the tragedy they cause.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Yesterday
OP
I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................
Lovie777
Yesterday
#2
I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor
Prairie Gates
23 hrs ago
#12
"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really?
sop
Yesterday
#3
I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ...
Botany
22 hrs ago
#13
I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war.
Botany
21 hrs ago
#21
Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice.
AloeVera
21 hrs ago
#25
Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter
thesquanderer
22 hrs ago
#15
Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on?
ChicagoTeamster
22 hrs ago
#17
Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday..
SamuelAdams
21 hrs ago
#18
A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house.
travelingthrulife
21 hrs ago
#23
Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security)
pat_k
18 hrs ago
#32
Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its
maxsolomon
19 hrs ago
#29