Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AloeVera

(4,585 posts)
25. Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice.
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:30 AM
12 hrs ago

But the military cost of inflicting all that destruction is separate from war reparations to the victim of an unjustified war. Iran has suffered huge losses to its infrastructure and economy. Why were 85,000 civilian structures, 600 schools and nearly 200 medical facilities destroyed or damaged? Water towers, oil refineries, power plants - the list goes on! It all means civilian suffering and increased poverty and deprivation. In a just world the war mongers should pay but we know that's not gonna happen. They destroy and then let others - the Gulf countries in this case because of course they will be asked - try to pick up the pieces.

Yes, the war will cost taxpayers hundreds of billions all told - half a TRILLION in increased funding for the military alone if Trump's request is approved - but none of it is going for reparations to Iran, which was my point.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 16 hrs ago #1
I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 16 hrs ago #2
I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates 15 hrs ago #12
"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop 15 hrs ago #3
More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger 15 hrs ago #5
Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda 15 hrs ago #9
Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina 2 hrs ago #40
Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger 15 hrs ago #4
.... yardwork 15 hrs ago #6
So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E 15 hrs ago #7
" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ 15 hrs ago #8
It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates 15 hrs ago #10
In my honest opinion, Mtnmama 15 hrs ago #11
I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany 14 hrs ago #13
It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera 13 hrs ago #20
I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany 13 hrs ago #21
Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera 12 hrs ago #25
Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado 14 hrs ago #14
Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer 14 hrs ago #15
Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs 14 hrs ago #16
Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster 13 hrs ago #17
Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad 12 hrs ago #26
Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams 13 hrs ago #18
It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin 13 hrs ago #19
Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool 13 hrs ago #22
A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife 13 hrs ago #23
$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz 12 hrs ago #24
Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k 10 hrs ago #32
Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem 12 hrs ago #27
I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy 11 hrs ago #28
Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon 11 hrs ago #29
TACO !! republianmushroom 10 hrs ago #30
Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k 10 hrs ago #31
Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X 9 hrs ago #33
They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun 9 hrs ago #34
Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil 9 hrs ago #35
Give me a break. City Lights 8 hrs ago #36
LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian 6 hrs ago #37
Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs 4 hrs ago #38
There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick 2 hrs ago #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US officials downplay tex...»Reply #25