Latest Breaking News

OldBaldy1701E

(11,747 posts)

7. So, all that for stock options?

Wed Jun 17, 2026, 07:41 AM

Yesterday

They make a world-wide disruption and then end up on their asses and having to pay Iran just to try and patch up what they ruined for everyone.

Why any other country would want to even be 'diplomatic' with this joke of a nation anymore is a surprise to me. It is obvious that we are becoming a real threat to the entire planet.

And, we don't seem too worried about what this nation had wrought. That is just as surprising.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate Hey Joe mahina

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US officials downplay text of the Iran agreement, saying it doesn't account for back-channel commitments [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Pay-offs for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Yesterday #1

I'm pretty sure a few countries in the Middle East are very uneasy................ Lovie777 Yesterday #2

I mean, they're on the hook for $300 billion and have a full-fledged economic competitor Prairie Gates Yesterday #12

"The framework is aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically to their internal audience." Really? sop Yesterday #3

More like Trump is trying to sell it to his internal audience. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #5

Projection. They're trying to spin it for people here. ananda Yesterday #9

Whipping our butts will not be hard to sell to the Iranian public. mahina 13 hrs ago #40

Back channel commitments. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #4

.... yardwork Yesterday #6

So, all that for stock options? OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #7

" aimed at providing Iran the ability to sell it politically" Strelnikov_ Yesterday #8

It's giving secret girlfriend in NIagara Falls Prairie Gates Yesterday #10

In my honest opinion, Mtnmama Yesterday #11

I.O.W.s The agreement gives Iran everything it wanted and 300 billion in reparations for Trump's war ... Botany Yesterday #13

It is not "reparations". It is a "private investment fund". AloeVera Yesterday #20

I might be wrong but @ the end of day the U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for paying for Trump's war. Botany 23 hrs ago #21

Of course they are. One of the many, many reasons to not rush into an unnecessary, trumped-up war of choice. AloeVera 23 hrs ago #25

Another worthless document from the dumpie administration. KS Toronado Yesterday #14

Back channel commitments?All that matters is what is actually signed,and with Trump,half the time even that won't matter thesquanderer Yesterday #15

Everything Trump for 10+ years has gotten us to this point where NoMoreRepugs Yesterday #16

Backchannel commitments for what? The rebuilding business deals that Trump wants the bribe money to be spent on? ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #17

Maybe they're trying to figure out ways to WestMichRad 23 hrs ago #26

Which is why they wanted to delay releasing the text until at least Friday.. SamuelAdams Yesterday #18

It was a birthday party favor for the man-child... Hugin Yesterday #19

Ah, Yessss; The Old "Back-Channel Commitments" Trick..... ColoringFool 23 hrs ago #22

A "political document" only existing as a birthday present for the loser in the white house. travelingthrulife 23 hrs ago #23

$300,000,000,000 is still $300,000,000,000. paulkienitz 23 hrs ago #24

Per "back-channel agreements" it is probably 500 billion (classified for purposes of National Security) pat_k 21 hrs ago #32

Trump and his war-mongering assholes are desperate agingdem 23 hrs ago #27

I'm surprised they're not communicating in "pig latin". Buddyzbuddy 22 hrs ago #28

Maybe Dotard tore up the original agreement because he didn't know about its maxsolomon 22 hrs ago #29

TACO !! republianmushroom 21 hrs ago #30

Of course, any back-channel agreements are WORSE. pat_k 21 hrs ago #31

Ooh backchannel commitments Johnny2X2X 20 hrs ago #33

They're just words. Nothing to see here. Scalded Nun 20 hrs ago #34

Translation: the memorandum isn't worth the paper it's printed on. patphil 20 hrs ago #35

Give me a break. City Lights 19 hrs ago #36

LOL! Did Dean Wormer put Iran on double-secret probation? Mysterian 17 hrs ago #37

Is a back channel agreement , one that goes straight up my ass? 3Hotdogs 15 hrs ago #38

There is an essential rule of law. TomSlick 13 hrs ago #39