Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlaw [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(173,136 posts)33. Deadline Legal Blog-Judge dismisses Comey and James indictments, says Halligan unlawfully appointed
James Comey and Letitia James both challenged the legality of Halligans installation. Its one of several issues in their cases.
Judge dismisses Comey and James indictments, says Halligan unlawfully appointed
— Jeff Johnson (@liberalarkie.bsky.social) 2025-11-24T18:16:47.495Z
www.ms.now/deadline-whi...
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/james-comey-james-indictments-dismissed-lindsey-halligan-unlawfully-appointed
A federal judge has ruled that Lindsey Halligan was unlawfully appointed as the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, leading the judge to dismiss the indictments of former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The indictments are dismissed without prejudice, meaning they could theoretically be brought again by a lawful prosecutor.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the DOJ will appeal. James lawyer said they will continue to challenge any further politically motivated charges through every lawful means available. Comey said his prosecution was based on malevolence and incompetence.
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie issued similar separate opinions on Monday in Comeys and James cases explaining her decision.....
The appointment issue is just one of several motions to dismiss that Comey and James have raised in their respective cases, another big one being vindictive prosecution. The appointment issue required an out-of-district judge to handle, and the matter fell to Currie, a South Carolina judge who held a joint hearing with Comeys and James lawyers and the DOJ before issuing her ruling.
Judges around the country had previously deemed unlawful the attempted installations of other lawyers to lead prosecutors offices in the Trump Justice Department, including Alina Habba in New Jersey. Yet that still hasnt led to defendants being able to dismiss their cases as a result of that illegality.
The official who purported to secure and sign the indictment was invalidly appointed to her position as interim U.S. Attorney. Because of that fundamental constitutional and statutory defect, the indictment is a nullity and must be dismissed, Comeys lawyers wrote in his motion to dismiss, adding that dismissal should be permanent in order to deter the governments willfully unlawful conduct. Likewise in her motion, James lawyers wrote that dismissal is warranted because there is no evidence that any other government attorney played a role in securing the indictment.
The indictments are dismissed without prejudice, meaning they could theoretically be brought again by a lawful prosecutor.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the DOJ will appeal. James lawyer said they will continue to challenge any further politically motivated charges through every lawful means available. Comey said his prosecution was based on malevolence and incompetence.
U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie issued similar separate opinions on Monday in Comeys and James cases explaining her decision.....
The appointment issue is just one of several motions to dismiss that Comey and James have raised in their respective cases, another big one being vindictive prosecution. The appointment issue required an out-of-district judge to handle, and the matter fell to Currie, a South Carolina judge who held a joint hearing with Comeys and James lawyers and the DOJ before issuing her ruling.
Judges around the country had previously deemed unlawful the attempted installations of other lawyers to lead prosecutors offices in the Trump Justice Department, including Alina Habba in New Jersey. Yet that still hasnt led to defendants being able to dismiss their cases as a result of that illegality.
The official who purported to secure and sign the indictment was invalidly appointed to her position as interim U.S. Attorney. Because of that fundamental constitutional and statutory defect, the indictment is a nullity and must be dismissed, Comeys lawyers wrote in his motion to dismiss, adding that dismissal should be permanent in order to deter the governments willfully unlawful conduct. Likewise in her motion, James lawyers wrote that dismissal is warranted because there is no evidence that any other government attorney played a role in securing the indictment.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlaw [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Monday
OP
I get billions of "breaking news" banners all day and night from the news apps
BumRushDaShow
Monday
#11
Comey case dismissed without prejudice. Halligan invalidly appointed, judge rules
LetMyPeopleVote
Monday
#3
Pound sand, Bondi! It's always loyalty over competence when dealing with the toddler-in-chief
surfered
Monday
#6
Judge dismisses cases against James Comey and Letitia James after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed
LetMyPeopleVote
Monday
#8
Deadline Legal Blog-Judge dismisses Comey and James indictments, says Halligan unlawfully appointed
LetMyPeopleVote
19 hrs ago
#33