Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MichMan

(16,404 posts)
10. Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 11:03 PM
Nov 18

The texts just surfaced with the batch of emails from the estate that were released by the Democrats in the House

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only Republicans were as eager to pursue Epstein's predator friends dlk Nov 18 #1
i agree with norman in general, but rampartd Nov 18 #2
Epstein had been convicted as a sex offender of minors eleven years earlier MichMan Nov 18 #3
i get it, but if court decisions are the standard. rampartd Nov 18 #4
Have no idea of what that has anything to do with Plaskett and Epstein texting each other in a congressional hearing MichMan Nov 18 #5
I hadn't heard about any of this before now, slightlv Nov 18 #8
Here is a clip from the Washington Post of some of it MichMan Nov 18 #10
Thank you... slightlv Nov 19 #26
Epstein was acting as an informant to Plaskett on Trump/Cohen for that 2019 hearing. SunSeeker Nov 19 #13
having a hard time following the defense here stopdiggin Nov 18 #9
Oops. Well that kinda' sucks. Well, okay - really, really blows? stopdiggin Nov 18 #6
Plaskett did nothing wrong. She was using Epstein as an informant. SunSeeker Nov 19 #14
believe that if you want to stopdiggin Nov 19 #19
Yes, during the hearing, so she could get info on what Cohen was talking about. SunSeeker Nov 19 #20
you do you. Meanwhile, I am going to criticize Democrats when they make egregious ethical stopdiggin Nov 19 #22
There was nothing unethical about Plaskett getting info to prosecute Trump from his former best friend. SunSeeker Nov 19 #23
Disagree on the very strongest of terms stopdiggin Nov 19 #24
You've made your opinion quite clear. I, and House Democrats, do not share it. SunSeeker Nov 19 #25
Enough already RedArkGuy Nov 19 #28
Don't be absurd. I advocate no such thing. stopdiggin Nov 19 #29
I support censuring her. You cannot be appearing to take Wiz Imp Nov 18 #7
I don't. She was not taking direction from Epstein, she was using him as an informant. SunSeeker Nov 19 #15
I'd also add that whistleblowers . . . RedArkGuy Nov 19 #27
Wasn't She One of the Impeachment Managers? Deep State Witch Nov 18 #11
Yes she was. But this is NOT payback Wiz Imp Nov 19 #16
It totally was payback for her prosecution of Trump. SunSeeker Nov 19 #21
The motion FAILED. Plaskett did nothing wrong; she was talking to an scumbag informant to get info on Trump/Cohen. SunSeeker Nov 18 #12
Who knew more about Trump and his dirty dealings that Jeffrey Epstein? mackdaddy Nov 19 #17
Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), is this lap puppy republianmushroom Nov 19 #18
Gosh I wonder what sets her apart in their minds mahina Nov 19 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Republicans move to...»Reply #10