Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Gov. Josh Shapiro says Kamala Harris will 'have to answer' for not speaking out about Biden [View all]LisaM
(29,346 posts)9. This is ridiculous.
This seems like pandering, and to say this to Stephen A. Smith who is (IMO) an overpaid buffoon is absurd.
If you read all the way down in the article, Kamala Harris said that she thought Biden was absolutely fit and qualified but had a bad debate.
Trump had a bad debate, too, which no one ever mentions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Gov. Josh Shapiro says Kamala Harris will 'have to answer' for not speaking out about Biden [View all]
Jose Garcia
Thursday
OP
I believe Gov Shapiro meant that former VP Harris would have to answer politically, not answer legally. While the 25th
24601
Friday
#68
Totally agree. While we all want more fight in our party putting something like this out to test the political wind
Cheezoholic
Thursday
#11
According to the linked article, Harris said that in an interview before the election
MichMan
Thursday
#12
Ironically it was Fetterman that recommended that Harris not select Shapiro
fujiyamasan
Thursday
#17
Shame on Shapiro for even talking to Smith. Smith is an arrogant know-nothing asshole
Wiz Imp
Thursday
#15
+1.! Another podcast buffoon loking to manufacture clickbait. And a politician
stopdiggin
Friday
#47
The President isn't an Emperor - his party is totally free to reject his wish for a 2nd term and quite a few would argue
Midwestern Democrat
Friday
#43
The point of this article seems to be to rile up Democrats and get them fighting. Fuck that.
Trueblue Texan
Thursday
#34
Well, I can cross Shapiro off the list of potential Dem Prez candidates I'd vote for
spudspud
Friday
#45
Well, if he thought this was a good way to the Presidential primary, he's wrong
wolfie001
Friday
#73
It's slightly more nuanced than all cabinet members. In addition to the Vice President, the 25th Amendment refers to
24601
Yesterday
#108
About...what? In her book she says nothing was wrong and had she seen anything..
CousinIT
Friday
#78
It should have been obvious Joe Biden wasn't up to serving another term. I thought Joe Biden
doc03
Friday
#86
What? WHY do you think she ran a campaign that "turned off many white voters?"....besides...
electric_blue68
Friday
#100
It was like how many hip hop, rap or whatever they are called entertainer's endorsements she could get. I don't give a
doc03
Yesterday
#110
Republican voters don't hate wealthy entertainers, don't resent the wealthy, who are part of "Us" in Us vs Them.
betsuni
4 hrs ago
#113
I agree that I don't think entertainer endorsements for Harris or any other Presidential election hurt the Democrats
AZProgressive
3 hrs ago
#115
European right-wing populism happens in good economic times and bad, in countries with strong social safety nets,
betsuni
2 hrs ago
#116
I'd tell him to "go play your God-Damn Monday morning quarterback somewhere else"
chouchou
Friday
#95
Never. And the snide criticism always begins before the book comes out and nobody's read it yet.
betsuni
4 hrs ago
#114