Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalLovinLug

(14,499 posts)
15. In Canada here, there was debate even before our contract to purchase
Thu Aug 14, 2025, 01:02 PM
Aug 14

Between the Saab Gripen, and the F-35
Both have cons and pros.
The Gripen is cheaper and is built for northern climates, and they offered to set up a manufacturing plant in Canada to employ workers to build them here. it is lighter and more manoeuvrable.

The F-35 is heavy because of its ability to support more heavy weaponry. But the F-35 would work better to mesh with the US for NORAD exercises. Also uses the very latest in computer tech. But because of all its many capabilities the working out of all the bugs has taken a long time and increased the price. Also the maintenance of the aircraft is enormous.

One concern here is that there is an "off switch" built in that any POTUS can order at any time. Obvious reason is that it prevents a country from using them against the US. In normal times, without a narcissistic criminal in the WH, this was no problem. Now, with a man-baby snowflake who can lash out unpredictably at any time he feels slighted, it raises concerns

I think there was a lot of pressure from the US to sign a contract for the F-35s. But now I hope they start looking at the Gripen again. It makes way more sense.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Headline by Politico is Misleading Gimpyknee Aug 14 #1
I think you're confused Torchlight Aug 14 #12
it would be great if one of these nations played the same game as the orange asshole and said... Javaman Aug 14 #2
What US companies will be hurt by this? Baitball Blogger Aug 14 #3
Boeing springs to mind. mwmisses4289 Aug 14 #4
Not Boeing Gimpyknee Aug 14 #9
Lockheed Martin is prime on F-35, plus Northrop Grumman and BAE systems IronLionZion Aug 14 #8
Anyone buying US arms will depend on us MadameButterfly Aug 14 #5
Additionally... Shipwack Aug 14 #14
You saved me some typing. BidenRocks Aug 14 #16
It took $1.5 trillion to develop. No sheet. twodogsbarking Aug 14 #6
Lockheed Martin is nervous SheLiberal Aug 14 #7
Oh, yes. I know a few and they are hardcore right-wingers. Baitball Blogger Aug 14 #10
Oh well, maybe the Allies who buy our stuff will start charging tariffs FakeNoose Aug 14 #11
The tariffs on steel, aluminum, titanium?, etc.. has to hurt too. I can see no good from any tariffs, ever. OverBurn Aug 14 #20
Jab harder Bayard Aug 14 #13
In Canada here, there was debate even before our contract to purchase LiberalLovinLug Aug 14 #15
Trump doesn't care! 3825-87867 Aug 14 #17
Good points Duppers Aug 15 #23
U.S. allies think twice about buying F-35s in response to Trump's antics LetMyPeopleVote Aug 14 #18
The present Ukraine/Russia war swong19104 Aug 14 #19
Totally agree Duppers Aug 15 #24
Al the countries that have F-35's in their current inventory should should fly them over to the US and park them. JPK Aug 14 #21
Didn't the republiCONS install shut-off switches? wolfie001 Aug 14 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Allies, in jab at Trump, ...»Reply #15