Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,195 posts)
17. LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs -
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 09:34 AM
Aug 1

Last edited Sun Aug 3, 2025, 12:10 AM - Edit history (3)

And yes, the monthly increases are net gains. The reported nonfarm payroll jobs increases are jobs created and job openings filled minus jobs lost: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143221098#post24

AND SEASONALLY ADJUSTED - pretty much all the numbers you see reported in the media or BLS summary are the seasonally adjusted ones -- that certainly is true of the headline numbers -- nonfarm payroll jobs, unemployment rate -- as well as many others like the labor force participation rate. (I'm tired of seeing comments like the payroll jobs number is high this time because we're getting into the holiday hiring season, or low because we're done with the holiday season, or it's slow in August etc. Seasonal adjustments adjust for these seasonal cycles - that's why they are called seasonal adjustments)




BLS news release summary: https://bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

The headline payroll job numbers (+73,000 in July) come from the Establishment Survey
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022: 225 869 471 305 241 461 696 237 227 400 297 126
2023: 444 306 85 216 227 257 148 157 158 186 141 269
2024: 119 222 246 118 193 87 88 71 240 44 261 323
2025: 111 102 120 158 19 14 73
The last 2 months (June and July) are preliminary, subject to revisions

Last 12 months: 128k/month average

# Employed in thousands (down 260,000 in July) come from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
If one adjusts the date range from 2021 to 2025, the graph is much more meaningful because it leaves out the huge swings of 2020 that greatly enlarges the Y axis and makes what follows look like tiny almost undiscernible squiggles around the zero axis
YEAR: JAN FEB MAR etc.
2022: 1016 483 608 --315 487 --284 164 477 75 --126 --177 752
2023: 958 178 417 162 --178 183 204 292 --33 --231 675 --762
2024: 66 --177 412 70 --331 --9 64 206 377 --346 --273 478
2025: 2234 --588 201 461 --696 93 --260

Last 12 months: 157k/month average
January and February of each year are affected by changes in population controls.
A very volatile data series from month to month. I used a double minus to make the negative ones stand out a little better
This Household Survey also produces the unemployment rate and labor force participation rate among many other stats

REVISIONS of the prior 2 months of Payroll Jobs: DOWN 258,000, from the BLS news release:
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Revisions for May and June were larger than normal. The change in total nonfarm payroll employment
for May was revised down by 125,000, from +144,000 to +19,000, and the change for June was revised
down by 133,000, from +147,000 to +14,000. With these revisions, employment in May and June
combined is 258,000 lower than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional
reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and
from the recalculation of seasonal factors.)

So compared to the report that came out one month ago we have 73,000 - 258,000 = -185,000 net new payroll jobs reported.

The July 3 report's total nonfarm payroll employment: 159,724k
. . . https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_07032025.htm -- Table B-1
This (August 1 report's) total nonfarm payroll employment: 159,539k -- a 185k decrease
. . . This month's: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_08012025.htm or https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm or https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001

###############################################################
###############################################################

LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs

Table A - Summary of Household Survey (produces unemployment rate, labor force participation rate) - https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm

Table B - Summary of Establishment Survey (produces the headline payroll jobs number and the average earnings) - https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm

Every one of these data series comes with a table and graph:

# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
   NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0000000001

# Employed in thousands from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
   NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02000000

# Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001
Monthly changes: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
    ^-Good for comparison to the ADP report that typically comes out a few days earlier
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0500000001

Earnings of Production and Non-Supervisor Workers (PANSW)
. . . # INFLATION ADJUSTED Hourly Earnings of PANSW http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000032
. . . # INFLATION ADJUSTED Weekly Earnings of PANSW http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000031
----- Nominal means NOT inflation adjusted. Just plain ordinary greenbacks ----
. . . # Nominal Hourly Earnings of PANSW- http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000008
. . . # Nominal Weekly Earnings of PANSW - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000030

# Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
The labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed. To count as unemployed, one must have actively sought work in the past 4 weeks (just looking at want ads and job postings doesn't count)

# ETPR (Employment-To-Population Ratio) aka Employment Rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000

# LFPR (Labor Force Participation rate) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

Unemployed, Unemployment Rate
# Unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13000000
# Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
    # Black unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000006
    # Hispanic or Latino unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000009
    # White unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000003
# U-6 unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13327709
# Long term unemployed 27 weeks or longer as a percent of total unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13025703
------------ end unemployed, unemployment rates --------

# NILF -- Not in Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15000000

# NILF-WJ -- Not in Labor Force, Wants Job http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15026639

# Part-Time Workers who want Full-Time Jobs (Table A-8's Part-Time For Economic Reasons) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12032194

# Part-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12600000

# Full-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12500000

# Multiple Job holders (Table A-9) - http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12026619

# Multiple Jobholders as a Percent of Employed (Table A-9) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12026620

# Civilian non-institutional population
Seasonally adjusted (they seem to have gotten rid of this) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS10000000
NOT seasonally adjusted: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU00000000
. . In Table A-1 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t01.htm they show the same numbers for seasonally adjusted and non-seasonally adjusted

LFPR - Labor Force Participation Rate for some age groups
The LFPR is the Employed + jobless people who have looked for work in the last 4 weeks (and say they want a job and are able to take one if offered. Looking for work involves more than just looking at job listings). All divided by the civilian non-institutional population age 16+ (in the case of the regular LFPR, or divided by the civilian non-institutional population of whatever age, gender, race etc. for the various sub-demographic measures. For example. the LFPR of age 25-54 females is the number of those employed or actively seeking work divided by the civilian non-institutional population of age 25-54 females.)

SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300000
25-34: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300089
25-54 ("Prime Age" ): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300060
. . . . . . Prime Age Men: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
. . . . . . . . . . . .From Jan 1960 to Jan 2025, Prime Age Men LFPR went from 97.1% to 89.4%. That means that the percent not in the labor force went from 2.9% to 10.6%, a 3.7 fold increase in this proportion.
. . . . . . Prime Age Women: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062
55-64: -------------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300097

LFPR - Labor Force Particpation Rate (prime age 25-54) by gender
All: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062

More LFPR links including by race: https://www.democraticunderground.com/111695870

ETPR - Employment to Population Ratio for some age groups
SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300000
25-34: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300089
25-54 ("Prime Age" ): SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300060
55-64: SA: ---------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300097

Data series finder (employment/unemployment related): https://www.bls.gov/data/#employment

The entire report: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf

Inflation rate (CPI)
. . . Monthly report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
. . . Regular CPI: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Core CPI: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0L1E?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Energy: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0E?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Food: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SAF1?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Food at home (groceries): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SAF11?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Calculator at: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
. . . One Screen Data Search for CPI components: https://data.bls.gov/PDQWeb/cu

Grocery prices (food at home) inflation compared to overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.in2013dollars.com/Food-at-home/price-inflation
. . . From 1947 to 2021 and from 2000 to 2021, food at home inflation very slightly lagged the overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142735789


Archives of previous reports - The monthly payroll employment reports from the BLS are archived at Archived News Releases (https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/ ). In the list up at the top, under Major Economic Indicators, select Employment Situation ( https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/empsit.htm ). That opens up links to reports going back to 1994.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's only going to get worse gab13by13 Aug 1 #1
The updated article noted the reported "147,000" job increase last month was revised down and was actually "19,000" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #3
Who would have ever thought the the Felon in the White House would put out rurallib Aug 1 #5
tRump and WH do not "put out" the BLS numbers. Revisions have been frequent for decades. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #44
You do know that tRUMP is going to drive out the neutral bean counters at the BLS? wolfie001 Aug 1 #78
He's going to try (viz. firing chief of BLS today, after I wrote). We haven't seen the business world react yet. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #79
You're always measured in your responses and very intelligent and level-headed wolfie001 Aug 1 #80
Thank you for your kind words. Mass action is in our hands. I too am hoping for a Blue Storm Surge 2026. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #81
Go Blue Go!!! nt wolfie001 Aug 1 #84
And May revised down to 14,000 jobs Johnny2X2X Aug 1 #7
Yup BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #13
No, we don't need so-and-so numbers to keep up with population growth because we don't know population growth. mathematic Aug 1 #14
It is true that nearly 1 in 5 workers in the US labor force is foreign born. The irony with the immigration wedge PatrickforB Aug 1 #28
The US does need population growth for a while to deal with and care for the retiring boomer cohort Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #45
And yet when supposed economy numbers came out, some people here argue LisaL Aug 1 #15
You do have the fact that BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #20
No "just" about it. BLS is professional and no toadies parachuted in. You have NO evidence. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #46
So, like Trump, you don't believe the new numbers? onenote Aug 2 #94
Fake news my friends - sarcasm of course chicoescuela Aug 1 #12
Totally unfair! Why is everyone turning against him! Hugin Aug 1 #27
always the victim. what a pos chicoescuela Aug 1 #40
Give it a month or so for payments to be missed... Hugin Aug 1 #26
I was thinking about this this morning. Cuts in Medicare, ACA, and food programs underpants Aug 1 #29
I think Rebl2 Aug 1 #34
The massive cuts to Medicaid now will drastically degrade the level of care for Medicare as a secondary effect. Hugin Aug 1 #36
Those cuts only kick in after the 2026 midterms, by craven design of the magabots in Congress who think they are smart.n Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #47
The cuts to the CDC, NIH, and research/medical training have already started... Hugin Aug 1 #49
Medicare is also being cut substantially NickB79 Aug 1 #77
I think you are incorrect about the "no thought for ramifications" part. niyad Aug 1 #57
hmmm Skittles Aug 2 #92
"Sorry, all our fault." - Krasnov (r-felon) & G.O.P. Doormats, Inc. BoRaGard Aug 1 #2
Finally the jobs report shows the terrible impact of Trump's policies. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #4
I wonder where are all the college and high school jobs that always occurred during the summer? LiberalArkie Aug 1 #56
As I understand it, this still does not include the shit that DOGE did rurallib Aug 1 #6
Correct. There's over 150,000 Federal workers who took the deferred resignation option. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #8
In addition to what Wiz Imp wrote BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #16
How is Krasnov fucking with the numbers? ShazzieB Aug 1 #72
you are right I was wrong rurallib Aug 1 #75
No worries! ShazzieB Aug 1 #76
We are now seeing definite signs of stagflation, as feared. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #9
This right here is bad bad as I understand it. The worst type of economic downturn Cheezoholic Aug 1 #23
Stagflation comes from supply shocks. Tariff taxes are a supply shock. Labour deportations are a supply shock. Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #25
"above the June total of 14,000" - they neglect to say that that was revised down from 147,000 Prairie Gates Aug 1 #10
Powell said on wednesday that lowered immigration was resulting in lower workforce size (growth) mathematic Aug 1 #11
That might impact/be related to the Laborforce Participation Rate BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #18
Oh absolutely, the LPR for immigrants is higher than native-born. mathematic Aug 1 #24
I put much more weight on the PRIME AGE LFPR (age 25-54) progree Aug 1 #33
Well you have a party ready to bring back "child labor" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #37
LINKS to some BLS Data Series Numbers and Graphs - progree Aug 1 #17
Thank you again for taking the time!!! n/t Cheezoholic Aug 1 #35
YW 😊 progree Aug 1 #41
I seem to recall that Biden's#s mcar Aug 1 #19
We can check. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 1 #22
No, not really. 2021 had nearly all positive revisions. 22, 23, 24 had more negative revisions than positive mathematic Aug 1 #39
An excellent link. Discussion too. Thanks. NT mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2 #91
Monthly revisions are almost always fairly modest. When the revisions become significant, it usually Wiz Imp Aug 1 #43
Interesting observation about a possible "turning point". . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 1 #48
By that chart, shouldn't we already be in a recession? KPN Aug 1 #60
You can't really tell that by the chart since it doesn't track monthly revisions. Wiz Imp Aug 1 #64
Wisdom of the Ancients: If circles and arrows have to be drawn on a chart for you to find... Hugin Aug 1 #21
Sorry about your jobs folks but did you hear about the new Ballroom? underpants Aug 1 #30
It'll have a big shiny disco ball and gilded corners. Hugin Aug 1 #38
Trump's tariffs, anti-immigration agenda and disrespect to other nations will break the American economy. Doodley Aug 1 #31
Likely Rebl2 Aug 1 #32
Long story short FakeNoose Aug 1 #42
Great gif! 🤣 ShazzieB Aug 1 #70
Ughh, look at the headlines at finance.yahoo.com. And S&P 500 down 1.6% 1136 AM ET progree Aug 1 #50
Maddow Blog-U.S. job growth turns cold as Trump's agenda takes its toll on the economy LetMyPeopleVote Aug 1 #51
Remember ADP reported much less jobs. FormerOstrich Aug 1 #52
ADP is only counting "private sector" jobs (using their payroll subscribers as the survey source) BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #61
Not in July. ADP reported 104,000 private sector jobs on Wednesday progree Aug 1 #67
'Brutal' job report leaves experts reeling: 'Hard to overstate how bad' LetMyPeopleVote Aug 1 #53
He'll blame Biden Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 1 #54
6 Of Last 7 Months Job Growth Has Failed To Keep Up With Population Growth DallasNE Aug 1 #55
Our new Golden Age speak easy Aug 1 #58
KA-BLAM! BlueWavePsych Aug 1 #59
No worries. Turbineguy Aug 1 #62
See #63 just below you /nt progree Aug 1 #65
President Trump says he will fire BLS commissioner after July jobs report disappoints progree Aug 1 #63
"Seems like LBN OP material" BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #66
Yeah, I figured. As soon as I saw my yellow "My Posts" light lit up, I immediately thought, ruh roh, progree Aug 1 #68
CNBC's breaking banner BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #69
Not only do they do these "First Friday" job numbers, they do CPI and PPI (wholesale) inflation, Productivity, progree Aug 1 #71
Kugler resignation posted about 15 minutes before your post BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #73
"Kugler resignated posted about 15 minutes before your post" - yeah I figured that, but thought progree Aug 1 #74
When using a " and a ( or ) BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #83
Thanks :) Yes, I run into that all the time, and do the same thing usually -- stick in a space progree Aug 1 #85
I know the feeling BumRushDaShow Aug 1 #87
I wish they'd give us a choice about using AI, but no, every time I do a Google search progree Aug 2 #89
I now frequently switch to Bing (M$'s search) BumRushDaShow Aug 2 #90
Yes, it would be nice not to have AI fill up half the first page. Mostly what I'm trying to do is prevent the AI search progree Aug 2 #96
Not Surprised OhioTim Aug 1 #82
Absolutely dismal and expected. kyburbonkid Aug 1 #86
Biggest Job Revisions Since 2020 Expose Pitfall of Economic Data progree Aug 2 #88
U.S. Is Trimming Back Its Collection of Consumer Price Data mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2 #93
Kick orangecrush Aug 2 #95
Checking against private sources sounds smart, but warning: they normally vary a great deal from the BLS numbers progree Aug 2 #97
The black unemployment rate (7.2%) is the worst since the pandemic-era October 2021 progree Aug 3 #98
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. added just 73,000 jo...»Reply #17