Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(157,777 posts)
Fri Jul 25, 2025, 08:14 PM Jul 25

9th Circuit rejects rule requiring foster parents to 'respect' LGBTQ children [View all]

Source: Law & Crime

Jul 25th, 2025, 2:03 pm


A federal appellate court has rejected an administrative rule in Oregon which bars individuals from serving as adoptive foster parents unless they commit to respecting a child's sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression.

In a 58-page opinion issued Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed a lower court ruling against Jessica Bates, a widowed, single mother of five, whose adoption application was denied due to her disagreement with the policy.

Oregon officials enforced the policy after Bates "objected to using adopted children's preferred pronouns or taking them to medical appointments for gender transitions," the appeals court explained. Bates sued and lost at the district court level – being denied injunctive relief by U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson, a Joe Biden appointee.

Now, in a 2-1 ruling on First Amendment grounds, the panel directed the district court to issue a preliminary injunction barring the Beaver State's Department of Human Services from using the rule in any determination of Bates' eligibility as an adoptive foster parent.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/restricts-and-compels-speech-9th-circuit-rejects-rule-requiring-foster-parents-to-respect-accept-and-support-a-childs-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/07/24/23-4169.pdf
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»9th Circuit rejects rule ...