Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

fujiyamasan

(210 posts)

11. Calling it an "incorrect citation" is misleading

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri May 23, 2025, 01:48 PM

May 23

It’s not just an incorrect citation, it is many cases completely fabricated.

If a paralegal or clerk or someone else were making up fake cases to pass as case law, they would likely be fired and their lawyer, potentially disbarred.

It’s time to throw the book at these idiots.

Would we tolerate generative AI designing buildings for us? Ok never mind, in trumps regulatory environment…

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ms. Toad

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge considers sanctions against attorneys in prison case for using AI in court filings [View all] BumRushDaShow May 23 OP

The key word is "considers" gab13by13 May 23 #1

"Hallucinations" is the term to humanize AI errors. bucolic_frolic May 23 #2

Hallucinations are very different than errors Jose Garcia May 23 #9

Considering?! PJMcK May 23 #3

AI isn't referenced in The Federal Rules of Evidence, is it? no_hypocrisy May 23 #4

Judges sure like to waste time "considering" Balatro May 23 #5

Lawyers have been disciplined for this too many times for Butler Snow to have any excuse. Eugene May 23 #6

I love how they call these "hallucinations" BumRushDaShow May 23 #7

I think they have told the judge to pound sand. republianmushroom May 23 #8

No shock to me that this happened in Alabama. Baitball Blogger May 23 #10

Calling it an "incorrect citation" is misleading fujiyamasan May 23 #11

This is what happens when we still have ZERO federal regulation of this fucking shit. Karasu May 23 #12

None are needed. Ms. Toad May 23 #14

Of course it's a thing. ChatGPT is designed to be conversational, not factual. Ms. Toad May 23 #13

The verification is the most important point about generative AI fujiyamasan Saturday #15