Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Treasury Department set to phase out the penny [View all]stopdiggin
(13,748 posts)137. which of course has not a single thing to do with conversation at hand
which, as a reminder, began as a note on the discontinuation of the penny - and then drifted slightly to include the impact of 'rounding'. Not a single incidence in there of any suggestion about walking away with unpaid goods. For clarification, such an action has nothing to do with 'rounding'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Noooooo, I love pennies and used to have several of those folding blue collector books of them (lost in a move)...
wcmagumba
Thursday
#1
What the fuck are you talking about? People do accept their change in pennies.
SunSeeker
Thursday
#23
"And if you tried to round down it would be considered theft or shoplifting."
stopdiggin
Thursday
#112
You make my point. You pay what the store tells you, or you get no groceries.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#132
No. Which is why I oppose getting rid of pennies when there is no law in place requiring rounding up AND down.
SunSeeker
21 hrs ago
#141
well, at least we're no longer ploughing trenchant (and immaterial) ground
stopdiggin
19 hrs ago
#142
Wrong. The rounding in Canada is mandated by law and consumers and merchants love it. It's neutral.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#35
Eliminating healthcare has nothing to do with eliminating the penalty. The poor would lose no pennies on bread
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#89
The law that would be required to eliminate the penny would have to be proposed, passed and enacted. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#96
The Bill regarding elimination of the penny was introduced in the House in February of this year
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#110
Here is the bill for the proposed law. Yes, it includes rounding in both directions, as is expected and sensible.
thesquanderer
Thursday
#116
That proposal would still make people pay 5 cents for anything that costs 1-4 cents. But better than no law.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#119
No. It does not work that way. Nonsense. The law in Canada mandates rounding, which balances out
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#34
You are the one spreading nonsense. We are not Canada. We have no such law. nt
SunSeeker
Thursday
#90
I never claimed the US had such a law. We are discussing the proposal to eliminate the penny.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#94
Healthcare has nothing to do with eliminating the penny. The poor won't lose 4 cents on bread
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#100
Eliminating the penny is much simpler than ANY of those. Obviously. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#125
Yes, as you say. It balances out, it's automatic in cash register, which is told cash or card
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#36
absolutely not. the sales tax figure remains - 11 cents (which is of course bundled into your purchase price)
stopdiggin
Thursday
#20
No. Bill added up, tax computed, final amount rounded plus/minus to 5 cents not ten, and only if cash.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#37
When I was in Germany 40 years ago there wasn't a lot of US coin change around for the PX.
Jacson6
Thursday
#74
Not a problem, no complication. Half the time the customer's bill is rounded down, the other half rounded up
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#33
When Nixon told the nation to stop hoarding pennies, my wife began hoarding them in earnest.
Bo Zarts
Thursday
#4
ONLY on cash purchases. and, even there, on any purchase greater than we'll say 2 or 3 dollars
stopdiggin
Thursday
#25
The lack of concern for the poor who do not and will not have the access to credit cards, debit cards,
hlthe2b
Thursday
#26
It's neutral. Half the time it rounds down; other half time rounds up. Canadians are happy with the move years ago. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#30
There is still a cash economy that is hard for many to remember--for the poorest among us.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#39
It's on the bill. The poorest in Canada have no problem with it. It's neutral, by law and automatic in the register. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#40
This isn't Canada. And our "conservatives" are in no way comparable or even rational as your worst.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#41
US cash registers work the same as Canadian. Probably made and programmed in US. And DONT SMEAR ME
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#46
Cash registers ring up the prices the owner charges. THis is idiotic, Bernard. I thought you had compassion.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#48
Look, I hate what Trump's policies are doing to Canadian-American relationships, but then you post this?
hlthe2b
Thursday
#57
This thread is about eliminating the penny. Dragging irrelevant policies into the discussion is a distraction.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#68
"Negligible" to you and I who are so little affected-not so much for the "cash economy." I wish we still had Bobbolink
hlthe2b
Thursday
#38
How about you stop using Republicon naming of the Big Bum Bill, which this has NOTHING to do with.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#49
It is additive. Just like tariffs and every single policy in that bill that will decimate the poor.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#51
It is not additive. You can't prove that. You haven't even tried to prove that. It is neutral
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#60
Says the Canadian who despite all of DU bemoaning Trump's damage to US-Canadian relationships
hlthe2b
Thursday
#62
You are not worth my time. It was clearly highlighted in your previous posts. BYE.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#66
Should your personal attack be alerted? I'm not going to alert your post #66
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#69
I made no personal attack, quite the opposite in ignoring your attacks* and hoping a future will resolve
hlthe2b
Thursday
#71
Not NOW you are not. Just posting the same thing over and over and over--ignoring my points & issues.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#76
You are the one repeating. I made points that you have not refuted. You repeat points I have refuted.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#81
You mischaracterize me regarding the poor. When something is neutral to the poor it does NOT discount their plight
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#73
You were the first to mention tariff taxes in posts 38 and 48. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#83
Count me opposed. Since when is creating currency or coin supposed to be at virtually no cost?
hlthe2b
Thursday
#8
It's neutral, it's automatic, Canadians love it, it saves EVERYONE time and bother. You have no points to make. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#42
This isn't Canada. GO read the Big Beautiful bill and the harms that will come to that population and
hlthe2b
Thursday
#45
It is additive. As is a lack of compassion for the impacts (EFFECTS if you prefer) to the poor.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#53
Getting rid of the penny is not additive. It is neutral and makes life easier. There are no "additive" effects.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#63
Repeating your retort that tries so damned hard to reframe my point to your desired argument is so meaningless.
hlthe2b
Thursday
#65
You have not been understanding that eliminating the penny is neutral and people like it where it has been done. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#70
Even reframing the use of the word "understanding..." as I used in my responses
hlthe2b
Thursday
#78
Fine. You have not been understanding of me. You have not understood that I am using economics and mathematics.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#84
No problem with nickels in Canada. Yes, Canadian Treasury is revenue neutral bc rounding evens out in long run. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#44
It is entirely neutral for the poor. It rounds out, it is automatic, it is no cost. Experience proves it. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#50
I am referring to the proposal of eliminating the penny which would be enacted by a law.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#87
So you're just making shit up. There is no US law requiring split rounding. nt
SunSeeker
Thursday
#88
The OP is about a proposal. The proposal is not shit. It is practical. It would be enacted by law. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#91
The elimination of the penny would require a law rounding cash transactions. This is obvious.
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#97
Tell that to Trump, who eliminated the penny via social media post, with no law in place. nt
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#123
Got any more practical suggestions? He did not eliminate it. Be real. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#126
It's not my suggestion. Trump tweeted he was ending penny production and Treasury complied. All illegal of course.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#128
He can order the tide to recede if he likes. That doesn't make it real. A tweet is not an Executive Order.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#131
When I was stationed in Germany the US stopped sending pennies to the base banks.
SeattleVet
Thursday
#43
The rounding from the elimination of pennies would be on final transaction, not on prices. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#111
Irrelevant: "costs more to manufacture than the coin is worth." That would only matter if the coin was only used
FSogol
Thursday
#98
these are a few countries that have dropped their equivalent of teh penny
moonshinegnomie
Thursday
#106
Nope. Nobody gives or takes pennies, esp not underground. Most were redeemed at banks. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Thursday
#115
They say it costs four cents to make each penny. Why not just offer everyone two cents for every penny they turn in.
twodogsbarking
Thursday
#107
Massive cash contributions from copper-mining firms to trump in 10, 9, 8, 7... (nt)
Paladin
Yesterday
#138