Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Treasury Department set to phase out the penny [View all]BumRushDaShow
(152,894 posts)67. We used to find them in the trolley tracks here in Philly

(those tracks are embedded in the street)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Noooooo, I love pennies and used to have several of those folding blue collector books of them (lost in a move)...
wcmagumba
Yesterday
#1
What the fuck are you talking about? People do accept their change in pennies.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#23
"And if you tried to round down it would be considered theft or shoplifting."
stopdiggin
23 hrs ago
#112
when I go to the grocery store, the cashier tells me the total on my bill
stopdiggin
17 hrs ago
#129
You make my point. You pay what the store tells you, or you get no groceries.
SunSeeker
16 hrs ago
#132
Wrong. The rounding in Canada is mandated by law and consumers and merchants love it. It's neutral.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#35
Eliminating healthcare has nothing to do with eliminating the penalty. The poor would lose no pennies on bread
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#89
The law that would be required to eliminate the penny would have to be proposed, passed and enacted. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#96
The Bill regarding elimination of the penny was introduced in the House in February of this year
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#110
Here is the bill for the proposed law. Yes, it includes rounding in both directions, as is expected and sensible.
thesquanderer
22 hrs ago
#116
That proposal would still make people pay 5 cents for anything that costs 1-4 cents. But better than no law.
SunSeeker
18 hrs ago
#119
No. It does not work that way. Nonsense. The law in Canada mandates rounding, which balances out
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#34
You are the one spreading nonsense. We are not Canada. We have no such law. nt
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#90
I never claimed the US had such a law. We are discussing the proposal to eliminate the penny.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#94
Healthcare has nothing to do with eliminating the penny. The poor won't lose 4 cents on bread
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#100
Eliminating the penny is much simpler than ANY of those. Obviously. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
17 hrs ago
#125
Yes, as you say. It balances out, it's automatic in cash register, which is told cash or card
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#36
absolutely not. the sales tax figure remains - 11 cents (which is of course bundled into your purchase price)
stopdiggin
Yesterday
#20
No. Bill added up, tax computed, final amount rounded plus/minus to 5 cents not ten, and only if cash.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#37
When I was in Germany 40 years ago there wasn't a lot of US coin change around for the PX.
Jacson6
Yesterday
#74
Not a problem, no complication. Half the time the customer's bill is rounded down, the other half rounded up
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#33
When Nixon told the nation to stop hoarding pennies, my wife began hoarding them in earnest.
Bo Zarts
Yesterday
#4
ONLY on cash purchases. and, even there, on any purchase greater than we'll say 2 or 3 dollars
stopdiggin
Yesterday
#25
The lack of concern for the poor who do not and will not have the access to credit cards, debit cards,
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#26
It's neutral. Half the time it rounds down; other half time rounds up. Canadians are happy with the move years ago. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#30
There is still a cash economy that is hard for many to remember--for the poorest among us.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#39
It's on the bill. The poorest in Canada have no problem with it. It's neutral, by law and automatic in the register. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#40
This isn't Canada. And our "conservatives" are in no way comparable or even rational as your worst.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#41
US cash registers work the same as Canadian. Probably made and programmed in US. And DONT SMEAR ME
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#46
Cash registers ring up the prices the owner charges. THis is idiotic, Bernard. I thought you had compassion.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#48
Look, I hate what Trump's policies are doing to Canadian-American relationships, but then you post this?
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#57
This thread is about eliminating the penny. Dragging irrelevant policies into the discussion is a distraction.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#68
"Negligible" to you and I who are so little affected-not so much for the "cash economy." I wish we still had Bobbolink
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#38
How about you stop using Republicon naming of the Big Bum Bill, which this has NOTHING to do with.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#49
It is additive. Just like tariffs and every single policy in that bill that will decimate the poor.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#51
It is not additive. You can't prove that. You haven't even tried to prove that. It is neutral
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#60
Says the Canadian who despite all of DU bemoaning Trump's damage to US-Canadian relationships
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#62
You are not worth my time. It was clearly highlighted in your previous posts. BYE.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#66
Should your personal attack be alerted? I'm not going to alert your post #66
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#69
I made no personal attack, quite the opposite in ignoring your attacks* and hoping a future will resolve
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#71
Not NOW you are not. Just posting the same thing over and over and over--ignoring my points & issues.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#76
You are the one repeating. I made points that you have not refuted. You repeat points I have refuted.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#81
You mischaracterize me regarding the poor. When something is neutral to the poor it does NOT discount their plight
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#73
You were the first to mention tariff taxes in posts 38 and 48. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#83
Count me opposed. Since when is creating currency or coin supposed to be at virtually no cost?
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#8
It's neutral, it's automatic, Canadians love it, it saves EVERYONE time and bother. You have no points to make. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#42
This isn't Canada. GO read the Big Beautiful bill and the harms that will come to that population and
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#45
It is additive. As is a lack of compassion for the impacts (EFFECTS if you prefer) to the poor.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#53
Getting rid of the penny is not additive. It is neutral and makes life easier. There are no "additive" effects.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#63
Repeating your retort that tries so damned hard to reframe my point to your desired argument is so meaningless.
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#65
You have not been understanding that eliminating the penny is neutral and people like it where it has been done. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#70
Even reframing the use of the word "understanding..." as I used in my responses
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#78
Fine. You have not been understanding of me. You have not understood that I am using economics and mathematics.nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#84
No problem with nickels in Canada. Yes, Canadian Treasury is revenue neutral bc rounding evens out in long run. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#44
It is entirely neutral for the poor. It rounds out, it is automatic, it is no cost. Experience proves it. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#50
I am referring to the proposal of eliminating the penny which would be enacted by a law.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#87
So you're just making shit up. There is no US law requiring split rounding. nt
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#88
The OP is about a proposal. The proposal is not shit. It is practical. It would be enacted by law. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#91
The elimination of the penny would require a law rounding cash transactions. This is obvious.
Bernardo de La Paz
Yesterday
#97
Tell that to Trump, who eliminated the penny via social media post, with no law in place. nt
SunSeeker
17 hrs ago
#123
Got any more practical suggestions? He did not eliminate it. Be real. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
17 hrs ago
#126
It's not my suggestion. Trump tweeted he was ending penny production and Treasury complied. All illegal of course.
SunSeeker
17 hrs ago
#128
He can order the tide to recede if he likes. That doesn't make it real. A tweet is not an Executive Order.
Bernardo de La Paz
17 hrs ago
#131
When I was stationed in Germany the US stopped sending pennies to the base banks.
SeattleVet
Yesterday
#43
The rounding from the elimination of pennies would be on final transaction, not on prices. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
23 hrs ago
#111
Irrelevant: "costs more to manufacture than the coin is worth." That would only matter if the coin was only used
FSogol
Yesterday
#98
these are a few countries that have dropped their equivalent of teh penny
moonshinegnomie
Yesterday
#106
Not capitulation, not rounding prices, no problem balancing books.
Bernardo de La Paz
23 hrs ago
#113
Nope. Nobody gives or takes pennies, esp not underground. Most were redeemed at banks. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
22 hrs ago
#115
They say it costs four cents to make each penny. Why not just offer everyone two cents for every penny they turn in.
twodogsbarking
Yesterday
#107
Massive cash contributions from copper-mining firms to trump in 10, 9, 8, 7... (nt)
Paladin
6 hrs ago
#138