Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

lapucelle

(20,186 posts)
Wed May 21, 2025, 08:34 PM Wednesday

Debunked: UN official's claim 14,000 Gazan babies could die in 48 hours was untrue [View all]

Source: Times of Israel

Debunked: UN official’s claim 14,000 Gazan babies could die in 48 hours was untrue

After a top UN official told the BBC yesterday that some 14,000 babies in Gaza could die in the next 48 hours if aid does not reach them in time, the British broadcaster clarifies that this claim was false and based on an incorrect interpretation of a report issued by the UN’s Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC).

Tom Fletcher, the UN’s under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs, claimed yesterday on BBC Radio 4’s “Today” show: “There are 14,000 babies that will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them. I want to save as many as these 14,000 babies as we can in the next 48 hours.”

The claim was widely reported in international media outlets, including The Times of Israel, and was repeatedly cited by UK lawmakers during a House of Commons debate yesterday.

However, BBC now says that after asking the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs for clarification, it turns out the remarks were based on an IPC report that warned that 14,100 severe cases of acute malnutrition were expected to occur between April 2025 and March 2026 among children aged between six months and five years.

Read more: https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/debunked-un-officials-claim-14000-gazan-babies-could-die-in-48-hours-was-untrue/



BBC (which aired the original claim) also issued a correction of sorts.

[T]he UN's humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher told the BBC thousands of babies could die in Gaza if Israel does not immediately let aid in. Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, Mr Fletcher said: "There are 14,000 babies that will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them."

When pressed on how he had arrived at that figure, he said there were "strong teams on the ground" operating in medical centres and schools - but did not provide further details.

The BBC later asked for clarification on the figure from the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), which said: "We are pointing to the imperative of getting supplies in to save an estimated 14,000 babies suffering from severe acute malnutrition in Gaza, as the IPC partnership has warned about. We need to get the supplies in as soon as possible, ideally within the next 48 hours."

snip==================

When pressed on the figures at a news conference, UNOCHA spokesman Jens Laerke said: "For now let me just say that we know for a fact that there are babies who are in urgent life-saving need of these supplements that need to come in because their mothers are unable to feed themselves."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crk2264nrn2o
85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
what a shock. AZLD4Candidate Wednesday #1
I'm sure that any moment now... Richard D Yesterday #3
Apologies for the plan to wipe Gaza off the face of the map? iemanja Yesterday #4
Apologies by the UN for their spokesman spreading propaganda. lapucelle Yesterday #10
Apologies for lending unconditional support for incompetent lying leaders at the UN. Beastly Boy Yesterday #13
Wow. Richard D Yesterday #16
My post is supposedly deplorable iemanja Yesterday #25
Delusional Richard D Yesterday #31
for this topic, this is a strawman. This is about the UN lying, not Israel. Please stick to the topic AZLD4Candidate Yesterday #18
I am on topic iemanja Yesterday #21
No, I want to keep the discussion on the topic of the OP. You are trying to muddy the waters. AZLD4Candidate 18 hrs ago #69
Hey, you know, when the facts don't fit the narrative, MarineCombatEngineer 17 hrs ago #70
Agree. It seems the tenor of the argument is "I don't care where the information comes from or if it's been debunked, AZLD4Candidate 17 hrs ago #71
This message was self-deleted by its author iemanja Yesterday #24
K&R rollin74 Wednesday #2
What number of starving babies is acceptable? Intractable Yesterday #5
Sorry, that doen't work on me. This story is about a UN official making a fabulist claim lapucelle Yesterday #6
Sorry, that doesn't work on me. Intractable Yesterday #8
How interesting to frame fabulist propaganda as an "exaggeration" lapucelle Yesterday #11
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #12
How does counting dead babies mitigate pervasive lies and incompetence coming from UN? Beastly Boy Yesterday #14
You tried that already. It didn't work. lapucelle Yesterday #17
You think you won an argument? Intractable Yesterday #29
There is no argument to win because you are not making an argument. lapucelle Yesterday #56
At this point, you are just trying to up your post count. Yes, the UN lied. Intractable 22 hrs ago #64
Oh, what the hell... lapucelle Yesterday #57
Quit the propaganda iemanja Yesterday #23
Delusional Richard D 19 hrs ago #67
That line is best directed at the UN spokesman who spread his fabulist propaganda on a BBC radio show, lapucelle 17 hrs ago #72
Boom. 💙🌈 Cha 15 hrs ago #79
And that happened here in the US JustAnotherGen Yesterday #37
a legitimate claim with the wrong time line stillcool Yesterday #52
At best, it's a fabulist lie. At worst it's outright propaganda lapucelle Yesterday #58
the demographic? The prognosis? stillcool 23 hrs ago #60
The UN propagandist named the demographic as "babies" lapucelle 20 hrs ago #66
What number of outright lies by UN officials is acceptable to you? lapucelle Yesterday #7
None. But they are all lying, aren't they? Intractable Yesterday #9
UN is lying and using fake death numbers. Like the lies from Hamas, they are discrediting themselves and your own posts Beastly Boy Yesterday #15
None of this is okay with me. That's why Israel has to stop. They are creating the next generation of hate Intractable Yesterday #30
Israel has to stop because UN is lying? Beastly Boy Yesterday #47
Israel has to stop the war -- period. D'uh! Intractable 22 hrs ago #65
I notice you didn't say anything about HAMAs stopping the war, MarineCombatEngineer 19 hrs ago #68
Israel are genocidal madmen. Hamas are righteous freedom fighters. AZLD4Candidate 14 hrs ago #80
And there it is, MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #19
You are saying the UN lied. If so, then what is the correct number? Intractable Yesterday #27
I just made an observation that you're trying like hell to distract from the actual thread MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #34
Again, you are impertinent. Intractable Yesterday #36
If you think I'm impertinent, then don't read my posts or use the ignore function on DU. MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #39
"never mind, your definitely not worth my time." Intractable Yesterday #40
Walking away from a rabbit hole and someone using failing to see things as debunked does win an argument AZLD4Candidate 15 hrs ago #74
Zero, but what number of brazen, lying UN officials is acceptable? Mysterian Yesterday #20
I see. So, dead babies are acceptable, but UN lies are not. Gotcha. Intractable Yesterday #26
What part of "zero" did you not understand? Mysterian Yesterday #28
I wrote "none" also. But that was above. It's okay if you don't read everything, yes? Intractable Yesterday #33
Your post does not cogently reply to mine Mysterian Yesterday #35
Please read the upthread. Nothing new is happening here. Intractable Yesterday #38
They got their intifada globalized. Richard D Yesterday #22
The UN claim was wrong, lying is wrong. gab13by13 Yesterday #32
Why immediately jump to believe they were lying? AloeVera Yesterday #44
What do you call saying one thing one day Beastly Boy Yesterday #53
29 kids and elderly starved to death in recent days. On top of the 57 children already starved since the siege began. AloeVera Yesterday #41
"propagandizing the UN mistake is disturbing and serves Netanyahu's agenda of ridding Palestinians from Gaza" Intractable Yesterday #43
This thread is about a patently false claim made by a UN official. lapucelle Yesterday #45
Actually the good thing is that there may not be 14,100 children in danger of immediately dying. AloeVera Yesterday #48
Better, there may not be 24,200 children in danger of dying. Beastly Boy 23 hrs ago #63
That it is. A well-worn tactic, as I said in post #44. AloeVera Yesterday #46
The only distraction is your constant vilifying Israel when it was HAMAs that started this whole current shitshow. MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #50
In that case you might want to remove the rec on my post. AloeVera Yesterday #54
A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes Jose Garcia Yesterday #42
And that was back in the 1800's. madaboutharry 15 hrs ago #76
The UN seems to have problems with numbers. republianmushroom Yesterday #49
The UN's Humanitarian Chief had the numbers right stillcool Yesterday #51
Killer post. AloeVera Yesterday #55
thanks... stillcool 16 hrs ago #73
I did not realize "malnutrition" & "dying" were the same thing EX500rider 15 hrs ago #77
Whenever Israel is mentioned, causing a bad hair day could be considered a war crime to some. AZLD4Candidate 15 hrs ago #78
Nuance can easily become a weapon Torchlight Yesterday #59
There may well be 14,000 kids in danger of dying. AloeVera 23 hrs ago #61
In that article, they claim statements from world food organizations, yet only quote people involved in the Hamas-led AZLD4Candidate 15 hrs ago #75
Yup the UN messed up then later Eko 23 hrs ago #62
They messed up, then blamed Israel, created a shitstorm in the media, and only then clarified their mistake Beastly Boy 2 hrs ago #81
There are mistakes and then there are mistakes. Eko 39 min ago #82
Ah, adeflection! How ordinary! Beastly Boy 33 min ago #83
You call it a deflection. Eko 30 min ago #84
Sure. You also call lying a "mistake" Beastly Boy 8 min ago #85
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Debunked: UN official's c...