Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pachamama

(17,259 posts)
27. As a multiple cancer survivor and big believer in screening and prevention:
Wed May 21, 2025, 02:28 AM
May 21

I have now had multiple cancers that I have survived - all caught due to my insistence for the last decades since my mid 20’s in having screening tests - even when they go against “recommended advice”. Sometimes the guidelines change regarding colon cancer screenings, mammograms, skin cancer checks etc. I never cared - I just insisted.

I haven’t followed the recommended guidelines - especially when they changed them. I am fortunate in that I have the means to do so - and insist on getting screenings more frequent or often. In my family has been breast cancer. So even at a young age in my 20’s I began mammograms even when they said it wasn’t needed yet - and when they changed the recommended guidelines for women later. Including on Pap smears. And guess what - it caught a breast tumor early and small and was removed. If I had not - I would have had much more radical removal necessary or worse.

Same for colonoscopy- in my family there is a tendency to have polyps. Polyps that can evolve into cancer. So even when my health insurance provider wanted to do a mail in kit sampler - I insist on getting a colonoscopy - and indeed - each time multiple polyps that are non cancerous and are removed. My most recent one found a few that were larger than usual and therefore now recommended every 3 years a colonoscopy instead of 5 years. Bottom line - if I just went with the mail in sampler tests like cologuard - they wouldn’t have caught the polyps that can develop into cancer. Who knows if they might have developed into colon cancer - thankfully I didn’t have to find out.

Skin cancer - I had melanoma over two decades ago - caught and removed and I had both surgery and immunotherapy. When the skin checks went from every 3 months to 6 months to annual - then to not required - I still insisted and went and had a skin check every 6 months to a year. And guess what - another melanoma was found a few years ago - caught early enough - in situ. Removed and gone. If I had just stopped getting screenings - could have developed further.

So here is my take - preventive screening is perhaps the most effective and important tool in PREVENTING and catching cancer and surviving. We live in times where health insurance providers who watch the bottom line try to void these costs. It is of course penny wise pound foolish because the cost to treat cancer and especially advanced is far more expensive and lives are priceless. When a person has the means to pay where insurance doesn’t cover or recommend - then absolutely do it. What a precious expenditure of money. Who says money can’t buy happiness - it can however buy some more time and quality of time.

I therefore am very confused and don’t understand how someone like Biden - whom I respect and love dearly - who as someone of means and also access to resources and medical officials and also with the history of cancer in his family and also the responsibility that he had to so many to remain healthy - did not do every single possible test for Prostate Cancer - even when not reccomemded or insisted upon. No test since 2014? If it had been me - regardless of the best doctors around - I would have said “do it”. And would with that info made important decisions. I just hope for Joe and for his family and our Nation that it’s not too late that he didn’t insist.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My question is, Why? He's had the best health care almost anyone can get for decades. Guess it was a personal choice. Silent Type May 20 #1
No dweller May 20 #2
I'd investigate medical team, then. Somebody check on Obama if he had same team. Silent Type May 20 #4
See my post above dweller May 20 #5
The one about Randi Rhodes. Saw it. Didn't seem applicable to Biden. Sorry about her cancer though. Silent Type May 20 #6
You said it was his personal choice dweller May 20 #11
I guess it's blame if you read pointing at each word in a post. Either he had cruddy docs OR Silent Type May 20 #12
Which is the crux of the matter dweller May 20 #14
Routine breast cancer screening ends at 75 Ms. Toad May 21 #28
Thank you, Ms Toad Hekate May 21 #32
It's right there in the article. LisaL May 20 #9
That choice for us peons is based on cost, false positives, psychological issues, etc. A Prez Silent Type May 20 #15
Presidents are just as susceptible to false positives nilram May 20 #16
If Biden had a positive, they would have performed imaging and a biopsy. Most of us, wouldn't. Silent Type May 20 #18
Yes, and As a president who was open about his health, a false positive would drag the nation along. nilram May 21 #22
Except if you're really, REALLY important Polybius May 20 #20
Too long live love laugh May 20 #3
This is typical for older men as moniss May 20 #7
STANDARD treatment for men over 60. elleng May 20 #8
Yes I've done annual physicals for almost 20 years and moniss May 20 #10
I am 77, I have had the PSA test every year for well over a decade. I find it hard to doc03 May 20 #13
I'm sorry, but I just don't see what difference this all makes now. hamsterjill May 20 #17
If it helps even one older person detect it early, then it indeed makes a difference n/t Polybius May 20 #21
Of course! hamsterjill May 21 #24
It is inconceivable to me that he didn't get screenings Beringia May 20 #19
Did his Dr.'s fail him? After 50 my Dr. recommended a test every 5 years. Buddyzbuddy May 21 #23
All this talk of PSA tests, the cost of which gets charged to health insurance companies. generalbetrayus May 21 #25
Yes stage left May 21 #29
It is what it is, but I would expect that the President would get PSA test during his physicals. CentralMass May 21 #26
As a multiple cancer survivor and big believer in screening and prevention: Pachamama May 21 #27
I find this really odd. Javaman May 21 #30
Oh, goodie! Another opportunity to shit on Joe Biden! Paladin May 21 #31
After age Rebl2 May 21 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden's last screening fo...»Reply #27