Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say [View all]h2ebits
(886 posts)39. IMO The AP article that was posted actually makes the information more understandable.
Here's the article that was posted by a fellow DUer:
https://apnews.com/article/vaccines-fda-kennedy-covid-shots-rfk-trump-bb4de15b6ff955d6cd0b406aaec3cdc5
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say [View all]
swag
May 20
OP
Also, too many Democrats were complacent & overconfident that nobody could steal an election
elocs
May 20
#51
IMO The AP article that was posted actually makes the information more understandable.
h2ebits
May 20
#39
What about health care providers? They can't get it, either? My daughter has been required to get a vaccine every fall
deurbano
May 20
#8
It seems to me that they would come under the heading of "at high risk of serious illness."
MLWR
May 20
#9
They will find a way to say "It wouldn't be serious"... if you kill off or get more health workers to quit even better
JT45242
May 20
#30
As a caregiver to a vulnerable, aging parent ... I think I'm in a similar boat? IIRC, it actually moved me up the list
Alice B.
May 20
#10
That was my situation, too! I was prioritized as a caregiver for my disabled adult daughter.
deurbano
May 20
#20
I'm not seeing it either. One thing I did see is that non-seniors with certain underlying conditions (a very expansive
deurbano
May 20
#49
If obesity qualifies, 40% of adults are obese, 20% of the children. I qualify because I am old. n/t
elocs
May 20
#25
That just reminded me that there is a new combo vaccine for flu and COVID that is supposed to
deurbano
May 20
#36
We just got new boosters (6 months after the last ones) because we will be traveling. My husband and I are over 65, so
deurbano
May 20
#31
I expect this decision could be reversed after a large enough 'campaign contribution'
groundloop
May 20
#14
For non-high risk groups, what does this precisely exactly mean? That it will be illegal for a healthcare provider (
progree
May 20
#16
They are so full of shit, they sceam and yell about their freedumbs and gubbmint mandates
ToxMarz
May 20
#21
You certainly can't get it without vaccines. I think we're talking about two different types of herd immunity anyway. ❤️
littlemissmartypants
May 22
#63
Yale News - " Yale study reveals insights into post-vaccine heart inflammation cases"
womanofthehills
May 21
#61
Means two things to me. First, we need a STUPID VACCINE, Second, there will be a black market in vaccines.
usonian
May 20
#50
As someone who is over 65 and immunocompromised, I guess I'm still eligible.
greatauntoftriplets
May 20
#52
Because of course if you are under 65 with Covid, you have nothing to worry about, and if you are
JohnSJ
May 20
#54
It could be nearly impossible for Pfizer or Moderna to complete new trials in time for the fall season.
LetMyPeopleVote
May 20
#56