Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(40,511 posts)
3. A DOJ attorney SUGGESTED Any reason whatsoever?? Not so, according to past governmental due process procedures.
Fri May 16, 2025, 01:30 PM
May 16

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), initiates the process by placing a green card holder in removal proceedings if they suspect a violation of immigration law.

There are only 4 grounds on which a green card can be revoked:
1. Abandonment of permanent residence
2. Fraudulent activities
3. Criminal convictions
4. Violation of immigration laws

https://www.theimmigrationfirm.us/blog/2024/06/4-grounds-on-which-your-green-card-can-be-revoked/

Court Hearing:
The green card holder is then brought before an immigration judge in an immigration court.


Decision by Immigration Judge:
The immigration judge, part of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), hears evidence and makes a decision on whether to revoke the green card.

Burden of Proof:
The government has the burden of proof and must show that the green card holder violated immigration laws.

Appeals:
If an immigration judge rules against the green card holder, they can appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals and potentially to a Federal Court of Appeals.


Murphy "posits" pro-Bondi corporate/fascist bullshit and the Third Circuit should have had none of it.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»AG Pam Bondi has the powe...»Reply #3