Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Montauk6

(9,114 posts)
13. Well... as long as we're spending it on something really, REALLY useful for once...
Wed May 14, 2025, 02:26 PM
May 14

Hey, people come and go; nothing says "committed" like an ICBM, and we're practically a month away from Father's Day.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who gets rich on an arms build up? Irish_Dem May 14 #1
correct me if wrong but the USA is the largest producer of weapons! NOT good IMHO. ;; riversedge May 14 #3
George Carlin said it best: Initech May 14 #7
A national treasure gone far too soon. MarineCombatEngineer May 14 #12
Yes the US military industrial complex. Irish_Dem May 14 #17
People/Corporations who give loads of "free speech" to all two parties. (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus May 14 #18
No thank you. I prefer my Medicare and Social Security. no_hypocrisy May 14 #2
I'm surprised it's only $100 Billion a year, unfortunately. Silent Type May 14 #4
Considering how old much of our nuclear weapons and delivery systems are, I'm surprised its not higher DetroitLegalBeagle May 14 #5
We got no money to keep the government open, but plenty to blow shit up! Initech May 14 #6
Two questions: where will this money come from... ananda May 14 #8
Looks like the national lab in Los Alamos womanofthehills May 15 #21
How come nobody mentioned that Eloon is in nuclear weapons business? Wonder Why May 14 #9
How exactly? EX500rider May 14 #15
Some people just positively, absolutely need this: Wonder Why May 15 #19
Don't really read sig lines....and: EX500rider May 15 #22
Probably not the warheads themselves but highly likely involved in the delivery systems. harun May 16 #23
I doubt they care about the landing ability of the Starship as icbms are on a one-way trip EX500rider May 16 #24
and they don't make me feel, well, safer. twodogsbarking May 14 #10
I went to grade school in the old "duck and cover" days but in Junior High School elocs May 14 #11
Well... as long as we're spending it on something really, REALLY useful for once... Montauk6 May 14 #13
Primarily maintenance - minimal upgrades. NoMoreRepugs May 14 #14
We already have enough to end humanity 300 times over or some shit. What, are extraterrestrials invading? Karasu May 14 #16
The older the ICBM's get, the less reliable they get, and maintenance gets harder & more expensive with obsolete parts EX500rider May 15 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. to spend $1 trillion...»Reply #13