Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump Says He'll Set Trade Terms, Doesn't Need Tariff Deals [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(166,739 posts)55. Maddow Blog-Trump's 'trade deal' with the United Kingdom isn't yet an actual trade deal
Last edited Fri May 9, 2025, 02:21 PM - Edit history (1)
The president said hes reached a conclusive and comprehensive trade deal with the U.K. Reality suggests otherwise.
Whether Navarro understands this or not, Trump's "conclusive trade deal" with the UK is neither conclusive nor a trade deal: www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-05-08T21:12:39.154Z
Whether Navarro understands this or not, Trump's "conclusive trade deal" with the UK is neither conclusive nor a trade deal:
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-trade-deal-united-kingdom-isnt-yet-actual-trade-deal-rcna205623
Its easy to understand why Donald Trump might be embarrassed by his lack of second-term trade deals. About a month ago, Peter Navarro, the White Houses top trade adviser, boasted in March, Were going to run 90 deals in 90 days. Navarro added that such a plan is possible in part because the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.....
On Wednesday night, the president used his social media platform to announce that the White House had struck a MAJOR TRADE DEAL. The following morning, he added that a full and comprehensive trade agreement is in place with the United Kingdom, which was soon followed by another online item in which Trump claimed, Together with our strong Ally, the United Kingdom, we have reached the first, historic Trade Deal since Liberation Day.
It all sounded rather exciting right up until the public learned that the trade deal isnt an actual trade deal, at least not yet. NBC News reported:
The emerging picture is one in which the White House has settled on a non-binding framework for a possible future deal with the United States 11th largest trading partner. This sets the stage for a series of additional talks negotiations that will likely last months that may or may not lead to an agreement......
The problem, of course, is that the first part of the claim is plainly at odds with the second: If an agreement is still taking shape and is likely to undergo a series of changes, then the new framework obviously is neither conclusive nor comprehensive.
In his first term, Trump had an unfortunate habit of wildly exaggerating the scope and scale of his narrow trade agreements. In his second term, the Republican is apparently picking up where he left off.
On Wednesday night, the president used his social media platform to announce that the White House had struck a MAJOR TRADE DEAL. The following morning, he added that a full and comprehensive trade agreement is in place with the United Kingdom, which was soon followed by another online item in which Trump claimed, Together with our strong Ally, the United Kingdom, we have reached the first, historic Trade Deal since Liberation Day.
It all sounded rather exciting right up until the public learned that the trade deal isnt an actual trade deal, at least not yet. NBC News reported:
The U.S. is working toward finalizing a narrow trade deal with the United Kingdom, President Donald Trump said Thursday, a small step as the White House pursues an aggressive tariff agenda across the globe. According to a document furnished by the U.K., the agreement will see duties on U.K. car imports reduced from 27.5% to 10%, while tariffs on U.K. steel imports will be dropped. In return, the U.K. is lowering trade barriers on U.S. beef imports and ethanol.
The emerging picture is one in which the White House has settled on a non-binding framework for a possible future deal with the United States 11th largest trading partner. This sets the stage for a series of additional talks negotiations that will likely last months that may or may not lead to an agreement......
The problem, of course, is that the first part of the claim is plainly at odds with the second: If an agreement is still taking shape and is likely to undergo a series of changes, then the new framework obviously is neither conclusive nor comprehensive.
In his first term, Trump had an unfortunate habit of wildly exaggerating the scope and scale of his narrow trade agreements. In his second term, the Republican is apparently picking up where he left off.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Ys. The only deals being made are shady corruption deals personally benefiting the Trump crime family.
Irish_Dem
May 6
#22
How in the world does our fearless leader believe that he running a country not even 250 years old can out maneuver
LiberalArkie
May 6
#3
He's the kid who didn't get picked for the team shouting they didn't want to play anyway.
RockRaven
May 6
#14
I hear the penguins have caved to all demands. It's was a illegal "of course" under the table fish deal.
OverBurn
May 6
#42
There is going to be a widespread economic downturn in all facets of American trade
RockRaven
May 6
#13
If US customers were not getting the best prices/values/warranties/deals from these countries,
Jarqui
May 6
#16
They won't produce domestically until Americans are willing to work for a few dollars
travelingthrulife
May 7
#50
Japan's finance minister calls US Treasury holdings 'a card' in tariff talks with Trump
Botany
May 6
#27
Wait. I thought IT already had tariff "deals" with 200 countries that kept calling and calling to
LoisB
May 6
#30
I think those ass-kissing deal calls came from within the US. Probably wannabe courtesans.
erronis
May 6
#34
So much of our main stream media is in the bag for the G.O. P.. Krasnov's people call me is a lie.
Botany
May 6
#35
"congratulations"? It's not a deal if one party says "not good". . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 6
#41
We all know he's been too busy golfing and thinking about stuff like Alcatraz to be making any deals.
Ohioboy
May 6
#45
Someone hand him a larger shovel with which to dig his own grave more quickly.
Ferrets are Cool
May 7
#53
Maddow Blog-Trump's 'trade deal' with the United Kingdom isn't yet an actual trade deal
LetMyPeopleVote
May 9
#55