Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(56,148 posts)

14. A lawsuit a plaintiff has won is by definition not a frivolous lawsuit.

Reply to Chasstev365 (Reply #1)

Fri May 2, 2025, 01:42 AM

May 2

These lawsuits against Trump are not frivolous. He has been losing almost all of them. That means they are meritorious--the opposite of frivolous.

The lawsuits Trump brings, on the the other hand, like his election lawsuits in 2020 (in which he literally lost every single one of over 60 lawsuits because he provided absolutely zero evidence of fraud), now THOSE are frivolous lawsuits.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Power of judges to hold Trump administration in contempt may be undermined with filibuster-proof GOP proposal [View all] BumRushDaShow May 1 OP

Frivolous Lawsuits? Chasstev365 May 1 #1

The GOP uses the law to protect themselves and gain power and money. Irish_Dem May 1 #2

Francis Wilhoit: markodochartaigh May 1 #11

Indeed. OldBaldy1701E May 2 #16

"And, what is giving these conservatives the power to do that?" The felon's majority. ancianita May 2 #20

I was going for a more 'base' answer, but you are correct. OldBaldy1701E May 2 #21

You're right. The base drive of this majority is Mammon. Selling out. Being "on the take." ancianita May 2 #23

Trump is just the sleazy salesman, the GOP is all in for a fascist dictatorship. Irish_Dem May 1 #3

A lawsuit a plaintiff has won is by definition not a frivolous lawsuit. SunSeeker May 2 #14

They are contributing to making trump NJCher May 1 #4

rather short-sighted keroro gunsou May 2 #15

The Judicial Branch is the third leg of our democracy. . . . h2ebits May 1 #5

Absolutely...this is overreach by the legislative branch. It won't stand PortTack May 2 #17

Thanks for your support. I'm not an attorney but the bloviating has long since gotten ridiculous. h2ebits May 2 #19

Does this bill likely have the votes in the house to pass? SSJVegeta May 1 #6

There is one of them words i hate. (FRIVOLOUS) bluestarone May 1 #7

All according the "Tyrant's Handbook" Grins May 1 #8

Here it comes Iamscrewed May 1 #9

The triad of checks and balances BidenRocks May 1 #10

... Solly Mack May 1 #12

That bill is about as unconstitutional as it gets. It would immediately be challenged. SunSeeker May 2 #13

Thank you for the informed post! It's really important that we understand what they are up to, but also the PortTack May 2 #18

What worries me is who the courts can get to physically enforce their rulings muriel_volestrangler May 2 #22

Me too, so I researched it, and courts can deputize local law enforcement. SunSeeker May 2 #24

Interesting - thanks for that muriel_volestrangler May 3 #25

It's not just Trump. J_William_Ryan May 3 #26