Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(156,381 posts)

4. There were 16 of them (including 1 (I) - King)

Reply to Ponietz (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 30, 2025, 10:05 AM

Apr 30

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00019.htm

YEAs

Blunt Rochester (D-DE)
Booker (D-NJ)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Coons (D-DE)
Fetterman (D-PA)
Gallego (D-AZ)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hickenlooper (D-CO)
Kaine (D-VA)
Kelly (D-AZ)
King (I-ME)
Peters (D-MI)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Slotkin (D-MI)
Warner (D-VA)

(29 NAYs (including 1 (I) - Sanders) and 2 NVs (Ossoff & Padilla))

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's late push for huge new corporate tax cuts [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 30 OP

Can anyone explain rationally why several of our Democratic senators voted to confirm Scott Bessent? Ponietz Apr 30 #1

There were 16 of them (including 1 (I) - King) BumRushDaShow Apr 30 #4

And once again, the stable genius throws a wrench into the works. Midnight Writer Apr 30 #2

That'll fix everything IronLionZion Apr 30 #3

More shifting of the tax burden to the working people 😕 cstanleytech Apr 30 #5