endured is uncommon, at least through all our research it never came up and Ive not run across it since.
Hers was discovered by accident really. I went with her to UCSF (3rd best neurology dept in the country or so it was listed in 2010.). We did lots of research and chose clipping over coil for a number of reasons. Her surgeon was well-known (Sharon Stones) and we liked him. Afterwards, when she emerged with dementia, we were told she either had a stroke on the table (no MRI evidence so they said the titanium clip could have been blocking the evidence) or she had a dementia in progress which the surgery accelerated (she was laser sharp before and I dismissed this theory). Both explanations were suspect but hey, they were the best so
Several years later at a neuro evaluation at Stanford, they said the reason was undoubtedly mechanical due to the complication of accessing the location of her particular aneurysm. Now this was a duh moment. UCSF viewed her surgery a success so it would not show up on undesirable outcomes. Success = patient did not die. I like UCSF a lot, believe her surgeon was skilled, and that outcomes are not guaranteed with any surgery particularly such a complex one. But Im bitter about being lied to and them not even holding something that obvious out as a reason.
Sorry for the tangent. My friend was managing director of a non-profit, lost her job of course, her life turned upside down, friends drifted away due to her dementia. Ive known her since we were 13, shes like a sister, and of couse I couldnt step over a friend in need.
We both rely on Social Security and Medicare. The cruelty of this administration is beyond words.