Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(8,603 posts)
3. In normal times it would not be "easily transferrable"
Fri Apr 18, 2025, 09:46 PM
Apr 2025

but we are not in normal times and the idea that they won't use this isn't a sound conclusion based on their actions so far.

Furthermore if you read the dissent it is clear that DOJ literally filed nothing other than "please don't let the judge do this". As far as mooting the contempt they could have argued that but they have not which is indicative of saving it to come back for another bite at the apple later or just crappy lawyering. I think in this matter they never intend to comply with literally anything that goes against them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court halts Boasb...»Reply #3