Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(6,127 posts)
6. Okay... if any of us did this, we'd be held in contempt, right?
Tue Apr 15, 2025, 07:54 PM
Apr 2025

Hold Ludneck in contempt and send the federal marshals after him. trump may get him out, one way or another, or he may throw a hissy fit to the SCOTUS. Let him. *They* are the ones who don't want to follow the processes.... we're the ones who are demanding that processes be followed (which is what I reason is the point of judge wishy-washiness. No playing favorites anymore with who gets do-overs or "forget me's" where contempt citations are concerned. The rich and the famous, the good and the evil both, need to get what's coming to them if they screw around like this.

And WHERE is one of those Jihadi marksman when you need them?!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump admin refuses to pr...»Reply #6