Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(153,135 posts)
Wed Apr 9, 2025, 03:13 AM Apr 9

Scoop: A dozen House Republicans mull defying Trump on tariff bill [View all]

Source: Axios

11 hours ago


At least a dozen House Republicans are considering signing onto Rep. Don Bacon's (R-Neb.) bill to restrict the White House's ability to impose tariffs unilaterally, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: It's a significant break with President Trump, who has threatened to veto the bill should it pass Congress.

  • Bacon told Axios that two Republicans — Reps. Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.) and Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) — and two Democrats have signed on to the bill as co-sponsors.
  • He added: "I have 10 others who want to do it but they want to talk to the trade representative first."


  • The details: The bill would cause any tariffs a president institutes to expire after 40 days unless Congress votes to pass a resolution of approval.

  • It would also give Congress the ability to pass a resolution of disapproval to eliminate the tariffs at any time.
  • More than half a dozen Senate Republicans have co-sponsored an identical bill from Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.).


  • Zoom in: A House Republican who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid immediate backlash from the White House identified themselves to Axios as one of the GOP lawmakers who plans to co-sponsor the bill.

  • The lawmaker told Axios that while Trump's tariffs have had positive effects, they are also hitting farmers in their district hard.
  • "It's right there in the Constitution — we can have a bill to make it more specific — but Congress has a responsibility too to watch this," the House Republican said of the legal merits of Bacon's bill.
  • Some House Republicans who have said they are otherwise inclined to support the bill, however, have cited Trump's veto threat as a reason not to.


  • Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/08/house-republicans-tariff-bill-trump-don-bacon
    25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
    Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
    We've known for a long time that Haggard Celine Apr 9 #1
    The RepubliCons ceded him the expanded power just last month. Now they want it back. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 9 #2
    Yeah, good luck with that. Haggard Celine Apr 9 #3
    I don't understand how ANYONE can listen to Trump for five fucking minutes Skittles Apr 9 #9
    Me either! Haggard Celine Apr 9 #10
    Because Trump is a stupid man's idea of a smart man. Ray Bruns Apr 9 #12
    Well put and Prof. Toru Tanaka Apr 9 #13
    he LOOKS ridiculous, he SOUNDS ridiculous Skittles Apr 10 #25
    "Presidents have too much power and now Congress is starting to catch on." BumRushDaShow Apr 9 #4
    Yes, much of the President's power Haggard Celine Apr 9 #5
    This Frankenstein monster legislation BumRushDaShow Apr 9 #6
    I seem to remember that that bill Haggard Celine Apr 9 #7
    When it was signed into law 6/24/02 BumRushDaShow Apr 9 #8
    They're hearing it from their constituents GoreWon2000 Apr 9 #20
    "The lawmaker told Axios that while Trump's tariffs have had positive effects" tanyev Apr 9 #11
    Which is why they won't challenge Trump. Prof. Toru Tanaka Apr 9 #14
    What we really need is veto proof numbers in the bluestarone Apr 9 #15
    Sorry to nitpick, but it's a timing thing. WestMichRad Apr 9 #16
    The very mention of "a dozen Republicans" possibly suggests BumRushDaShow Apr 9 #18
    Angry phone calls and emails to the R representatives DO make a difference FakeNoose Apr 9 #19
    "Mull" means "think about (a fact, proposal, or request) deeply and at length." Bozvotros Apr 9 #17
    Thinking is not doing. Let them DO something, if they have the character to do so. Otherwise, they can STFU. nt eppur_se_muova Apr 9 #23
    I'll believe it when I see it. WinstonSmith4740 Apr 9 #21
    Blah, blah, blah, mull, mull, mull. I won't believe it until they actually DO something. Martin68 Apr 9 #22
    Keep "Mulling" , you spineless weasels! mpcamb Apr 9 #24
    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scoop: A dozen House Repu...