Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(7,718 posts)
8. Not too many days
Fri Jul 29, 2022, 09:19 AM
Jul 2022

ago I was having a conversation about the pressure for rigid conformity in the '50's and into the '60's. I touched on the topic of short skirts in school when I was a kid. Short was defined in our school area as follows: The girl was made to kneel on the floor and if her skirt did not touch the floor it was too short and she would either have to lower it or be sent home. This check of her clothing was usually done by the male principal or vice-principal taking her out into the hallway and performing the "check" in full view of her classmates. In my school most girls were sent home with a letter from the school. The school administration/school board attitude was that they weren't going to have "that kind of girl" in their school. Most of the girls I ever saw sent home "failed the test" by way less than an inch or so. But never did they question the daughters of the mayor, police chief or other big shots.

As you said this was common stuff. Take the girl out and humiliate her in front of her classmates. Conformity in America. I remember an episode where two lesbian students (honestly we hadn't even heard the word or had any idea of things except to call boys "queer" in a taunting way) during lunch hour had gone into a secluded area. The vice-principal spotted them and came and got 3 boys to go with him but didn't tell the boys what it was about. So he took them by surprise with their male classmates standing there gawking at them. The girls were marched out into the school lobby for all to see while the cops were called and two squad cars took the girls home. They never returned to school. Conformity and pressure.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rejecting the skirt was just trumpist "enemy of the people "stupidity rampartc Jul 2022 #1
There's so much wrong with this story, I don't know where to begin. BComplex Jul 2022 #2
I'm sure the viewing this execution was part of her job. They were keeping her from doing her job Walleye Jul 2022 #3
Many official proceedings have a media requirement UpInArms Jul 2022 #6
The press needs to report about public executions. Irish_Dem Jul 2022 #12
Back in my younger years... 2naSalit Jul 2022 #4
Not too many days moniss Jul 2022 #8
When I was in high school (public), girls had to kneel down to get their shirt length measured. Irish_Dem Jul 2022 #10
Yup. 2naSalit Jul 2022 #17
Yes female clothing was strictly regulated. Irish_Dem Jul 2022 #18
That's weird. If the officials that told her that are loyal Fox News viewers, tanyev Jul 2022 #5
Too bad for her snowybirdie Jul 2022 #7
Well. That's an interesting viewpoint for someone who professes to be a Democrat. Higherarky Jul 2022 #14
My point snowybirdie Jul 2022 #16
I do think most good Democrats think capital punishment is terrible. Higherarky Jul 2022 #20
We must preserve the moral standing of our wimmenfolk, so she can watch us kill this guy. nt eppur_se_muova Jul 2022 #9
Strict control over all aspects of women's lives. Irish_Dem Jul 2022 #11
There was an unexplained three-hour delay before Alabama carried out last night's execution mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2022 #13
wtf!!!!! Celerity Jul 2022 #15
So in 1994, 50 yr. old Joe Nathan James Jr. would've been 22 or 23 yrs. 2live is 2fly Jul 2022 #19
A reporter went to cover an execution. She was told her skirt was too short. mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2022 #21
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Alabama»ADOC officials tell repor...»Reply #8