Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hakeem Jeffries says he will oppose bid to cut off Israel aid [View all]Nixie
(18,289 posts)72. Thank you. I agree that the majority of the base knows we're in
the minority and how we got there. Holding rallies isnt the same as working to take back control of the House. Thats where the power is, and the republicans obviously know that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Since there are two sides to every fight, can we require the elected hamas government to
AZLD4Candidate
Yesterday
#55
My post is about US taxpayer funding of Israel. I don't think we are funding Hamas or Palestine?
walkingman
Yesterday
#58
Many Congresspersons have said it is poorly written and could unintentionally prevent humanitarian aid to the region
Quiet Em
Yesterday
#4
Israel needs New, Honest, and more Moderate Leadership- that does not look like
Ars Longa
Yesterday
#37
Does Israel need assistance with initiatives related with humanitarian aid, and refugee resettlement?
Autumn
Yesterday
#11
and how much of this aid does Israel redirect to building BOMBS to continue their GENOCIDE in GAZA ?
Jack Valentino
Yesterday
#19
Conditions? Netenyahu wouldn't abide by them, and Trump wouldn't hold him to them.
sop
Yesterday
#28
Ignoring for a second that we're talking about a conflict 145 years in process...
CrimsonBight
4 hrs ago
#64
Concern for Palestinians as pawns, by those opposing this amendment, is very touching.
AloeVera
Yesterday
#43
Jeffries interpretation is not wrong and he is far from the only Democrat raising concerns about it.
Quiet Em
Yesterday
#51
The intent is clearly to cut off military aid. The fact that it is a Republican putting it forward looks terrible.
AloeVera
Yesterday
#59
Israel doesn't need our aid. Gaza does. Lebanon does. The countries that had USAID
LuvLoogie
Yesterday
#42
"Hey you know that thing that so enraged millions of voters that they re-elected the worst president in history?"
Takket
Yesterday
#45
A majority of Dems, including some of the others in Dem Leadership, voted to cut it off
Celerity
1 hr ago
#71