Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The judge has DISMISSED the criminal charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia on vindictive and selective prosecution ground [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(182,727 posts)40. Deadline Legal Blog-Judge dismisses Kilmar Abrego Garcia's criminal indictment as vindictive by Trump DOJ
A judge found that Abrego wouldnt have been prosecuted if he hadnt brought a successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador.
Trump administrationâs efforts âto create a boogeymanâ FAILS BIGLY
— Anti-Trumpism (@forabettertomorrow.bsky.social) 2026-05-22T21:29:15.523Z
Judge dismisses Kilmar Abrego Garciaâs criminal indictment as vindictive by Trump DOJ
Garcia should be entitled to millions from Trumpâs slush fund
Just Sayinâ
https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/judge-dismisses-kilmar-abrego-garcias-criminal-indictment-trump-doj
A federal judge on Friday granted Kilmar Abrego Garcias motion to dismiss his indictment in Tennessee after Abrego argued that he was only charged by the Trump administration because he successfully challenged his illegal removal to El Salvador.
The Trump administration had resisted remedying that illegal removal for months before it finally brought him back in June 2025 to the United States, where it had criminal charges waiting for him.
The objective evidence here shows that, absent Abregos successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw wrote in his rare grant of such a motion, which the judge said he didnt do lightly.
Vindictive prosecution motions are rarely granted but have been brought by several defendants targeted by the administration in President Donald Trumps revenge-themed second term.....
The Executive Branch closed its investigation on the November 2022 traffic stop, Crenshaw wrote Friday, adding, Only after Abrego succeeded in vindicating his rights did the Executive Branch reopen that investigation.
In his ruling, the judge referred to acting Attorney General Todd Blanches investigation as tainted. Crenshaw wrote that instead of investigating the November 2022 traffic stop to identify who was responsible for the human smuggling, Blanche started the investigation to implicate Abrego. He did so to justify the Executive Branchs decision to remove him to El Salvador.
Abregos illegal removal and the prolonged fight over his return drew widespread attention last year.
The Trump administration had resisted remedying that illegal removal for months before it finally brought him back in June 2025 to the United States, where it had criminal charges waiting for him.
The objective evidence here shows that, absent Abregos successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution, U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw wrote in his rare grant of such a motion, which the judge said he didnt do lightly.
Vindictive prosecution motions are rarely granted but have been brought by several defendants targeted by the administration in President Donald Trumps revenge-themed second term.....
The Executive Branch closed its investigation on the November 2022 traffic stop, Crenshaw wrote Friday, adding, Only after Abrego succeeded in vindicating his rights did the Executive Branch reopen that investigation.
In his ruling, the judge referred to acting Attorney General Todd Blanches investigation as tainted. Crenshaw wrote that instead of investigating the November 2022 traffic stop to identify who was responsible for the human smuggling, Blanche started the investigation to implicate Abrego. He did so to justify the Executive Branchs decision to remove him to El Salvador.
Abregos illegal removal and the prolonged fight over his return drew widespread attention last year.
I believe that Blanche will face disbarment due to this and other actions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The judge has DISMISSED the criminal charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia on vindictive and selective prosecution ground [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
May 22
OP
Should have been done a year ago. This was obviously a vindictive prosecution from Day 1.
Midnight Writer
May 22
#6
As is Hillary Clinton and all the law firms Trump blackballed who employee people he dislikes.
cstanleytech
May 22
#33
Deadline Legal Blog-Judge dismisses Kilmar Abrego Garcia's criminal indictment as vindictive by Trump DOJ
LetMyPeopleVote
May 24
#40
"Todd Blanche's disastrous interview opened the door to Abrego obtaining the evidence to prove vindictive prosecution."
mahatmakanejeeves
Tuesday
#41