Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Even Robert Reich is Disappointing Me [View all]Cha
(320,792 posts)26. TY, snippets from your link...
You may be thinking: a billionaire? Hear me out. Steyer is the only candidate with a plan to tax the wealthy and corporations to invest in public services.
Yes, the billionaire is the only candidate with a plan to tax billionaires.
Steyer is the only candidate who has said hed vote for the billionaire wealth tax, and hes also said we need to go even further. Under his revenue plan, hed raise taxes on corporations and other billionaires to fund schools and healthcare.
Steyer understands that economic growth depends on a strong middle class, not trickle down nonsense.
On the issue of artificial intelligence, Steyer is the only candidate with a plan to tax Big Tech and share the gains with working people. Under Steyers plan, he will guarantee every worker impacted by AI has a good-paying job.
When it comes to single-payer healthcare, Steyer is also committed to making California a model for the rest of the nation.
But dont take my word for it. Steyers progressive policies have won him the support of nurses, teachers, and other labor unions across the state. At the same time, PG&E, Chevron, and MAGA billionaires are spending millions against him.
Weve had wealthy Democratic politicians before. FDR and JFK had tremendous fortunes, yet they enacted some of the most progressive policies in American history.
Meanwhile, the other candidates in the race for governor havent taken a stand on the billionaire wealth tax. Why? I fear its because they dont want to upset the wealthy donors and corporations backing their campaigns. Its that simple.
Yes, the billionaire is the only candidate with a plan to tax billionaires.
Steyer is the only candidate who has said hed vote for the billionaire wealth tax, and hes also said we need to go even further. Under his revenue plan, hed raise taxes on corporations and other billionaires to fund schools and healthcare.
Steyer understands that economic growth depends on a strong middle class, not trickle down nonsense.
On the issue of artificial intelligence, Steyer is the only candidate with a plan to tax Big Tech and share the gains with working people. Under Steyers plan, he will guarantee every worker impacted by AI has a good-paying job.
When it comes to single-payer healthcare, Steyer is also committed to making California a model for the rest of the nation.
But dont take my word for it. Steyers progressive policies have won him the support of nurses, teachers, and other labor unions across the state. At the same time, PG&E, Chevron, and MAGA billionaires are spending millions against him.
Weve had wealthy Democratic politicians before. FDR and JFK had tremendous fortunes, yet they enacted some of the most progressive policies in American history.
Meanwhile, the other candidates in the race for governor havent taken a stand on the billionaire wealth tax. Why? I fear its because they dont want to upset the wealthy donors and corporations backing their campaigns. Its that simple.
https://robertreich.substack.com/p/tom-steyer-for-governor-of-california
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, that's my rule too- no celebrities or billionaire candidates- ever, period. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Wednesday
#8
It's a tough choice. And I missed the second debate, so there's that. I'll try to watch it.
Abolishinist
Thursday
#17
Reich posted Steyer explaining "Why Tax Cuts for the Rich Are So Stupid" back in 2017.
betsuni
Thursday
#19
Your point is irrefutable. None the less Steyer is not just occasionally doing the right thing
SSJVegeta
Thursday
#36