Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I may get banned for this, but [View all]hunter
(40,741 posts)63. This perspective is bullshit.
Should we be like the Republicans, ignoring or silencing their victims?
I think not.
The Democratic Party has a deep bench of highly qualified and electable candidates who are not sex pests or abusers. We don't have to compromise. We don't have to shrug our shoulders, mutter "boys will be boys" and look away when shit like this is exposed. It's better to assume that "where there is smoke there is fire" than to dismiss the claims of credible women as some kind of hysterical morning-after regret.
It can't be all that difficult to find candidates who are not creepy and have never had the sort of sex that anyone regrets afterwards.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
140 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not saying he is innocent, but I do believe the timing stinks of rat fuckery.
SheltieLover
22 hrs ago
#1
Victims in cases like these will often come forward when they see that someone they know as a predator or pest is about
WhiskeyGrinder
22 hrs ago
#24
That is, indeed, a commonality among sexual assault survivors, but I'm still reserving judgment.
SheltieLover
22 hrs ago
#28
I agree with you. I think everyone involved .. Women, men, witnesses should take a polygraph.
Trueblue1968
19 hrs ago
#92
an ABSOLUTELY common dynamic in sexual assault .. - - - - - - - - - - -(nt)-
stopdiggin
22 hrs ago
#32
"why did you wait ?" is an age old question that has an unfortunate history of being weaponized ....
stopdiggin
22 hrs ago
#31
Fun fact: It was George Conway (the former Mr. Kellyanne Conway) who told E. Jean Carroll to file a suit against T💩p.
OMGWTF
21 hrs ago
#40
Politico says they've seen a written confidentiality and non-disparagement agreement
muriel_volestrangler
21 hrs ago
#50
I am not male & am a strong feminist with a strong bs sniffer & this stinks!
SheltieLover
20 hrs ago
#79
Most of the bottom tier Dems in the race should've pulled out, imo &, in fact that they didn't makes me wonder how many
SheltieLover
19 hrs ago
#94
I don't know either, Jill, but phone numbers can be spoofed and we know ruskies are great at hacking...
SheltieLover
22 hrs ago
#26
Not underage perhaps, but unable to consent, and on the lower end of the power dynamic
RandomNumbers
29 min ago
#139
I was skeptical about one accuser, as she had a continuing relationship, but with four accusers? Nah, bye Eric
Pompoy
8 hrs ago
#136
Sometimes Democrats need math lessons OR, they need to think of the party before themselves.
LeftInTX
16 hrs ago
#123
Reason No. I-Lost-Count why victims don't speak out: They're seen as saboteurs.
WhiskeyGrinder
22 hrs ago
#4
If he could up his numbers to double digits he could be a GOP presidential nominee in 2028.
Vinca
22 hrs ago
#16
How many of those Dems have been as vocal as Swalwell against Piggy?
MorbidButterflyTat
21 hrs ago
#51
so all these former Democratic staffers - have reemerged as Republican operatives .. ?
stopdiggin
22 hrs ago
#10
Took 3 weeks and 6 additional women accusing Franken before the calls to resign
EdmondDantes_
22 hrs ago
#38
in Franken's case, Stone definitely got the ball rolling but yes, Franken chose to resign. He wasn't forced out.
LymphocyteLover
21 hrs ago
#43
I don't think so. Think of it as a blessing this came out now and not further down the road.
LymphocyteLover
21 hrs ago
#42
Sigh. So, we're still not believing the women. Political party doesn't matter, it's all about not believing the women.
mucholderthandirt
21 hrs ago
#52
One of the incidents was in 2024. And it often happens that after some woman finally comes forward,
pnwmom
5 hrs ago
#138
He did apologize to his wife for "past errors" whatever that means. Otherwise it was a denial.
33taw
21 hrs ago
#73
I thought you were going to say how our supposed ally, Israel, is really screwing the USA over and over. My mistake. nt
Exp
20 hrs ago
#77
We should know our candidates better. When they tell you who they are the first time believe them.
Walleye
20 hrs ago
#80
Didn't 16 or 17 women accuse TrumpenFuhrer of the same thing and REPUBLICANS DIDNT CARE???
NoMoreRepugs
20 hrs ago
#86
Yes, if Swalwell is responsible for sexual assault, he needs be held to account
Grim Chieftain
20 hrs ago
#87
If he didn't do anything wrong IMO he should stay in the gov race and immediately file a lawsuit
in2herbs
20 hrs ago
#91
I love the quote, ""Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds / Or bends with the remover to remove."
Martin68
17 hrs ago
#109
Who always benefits from these things? That's where the focus should also be.
live love laugh
16 hrs ago
#116
I think the difference is that the republicans support the nastiest, hidden elements of the government. They are the
LT Barclay
14 hrs ago
#125
So Katie Porter isn't electable because she used a swear word, but we're supposed
pnwmom
5 hrs ago
#137