Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I may get banned for this, but [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(106,284 posts)50. Politico says they've seen a written confidentiality and non-disparagement agreement
despite the campaign's claim that they never used them.
A former employee of Rep. Eric Swalwell signed an agreement with confidentiality and non-disparagement requirements when they left his office, despite the California Democrats claim that no one on his staff signed an NDA during his tenure.
The agreement, obtained by POLITICO, pertained to a workplace discrimination dispute and was not related to sexual harassment, according to the employee, who was granted anonymity because they feared retaliation. The document is dated within the last five years; POLITICO agreed not to disclose the specific year to protect the employees anonymity.
...
In 13 years, no one in Eric Swalwells Congressional office has ever been asked to sign an NDA. Ever, Micah Beasley, a campaign spokesperson, said in a statement.
...
The agreement has multiple provisions regarding confidentiality and non-disclosure. It stipulates that, by signing, the employee will not voluntarily disseminate or publish, or cause anyone else to disseminate or publish, in any manner, disparaging, threatening, defamatory, or negative remarks or comments about their employment in Swalwells office or any information learned during that time that is adverse to the interests of Swalwells office or staff.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/10/swalwell-staffer-discrimination-settlement-00867894
The agreement, obtained by POLITICO, pertained to a workplace discrimination dispute and was not related to sexual harassment, according to the employee, who was granted anonymity because they feared retaliation. The document is dated within the last five years; POLITICO agreed not to disclose the specific year to protect the employees anonymity.
...
In 13 years, no one in Eric Swalwells Congressional office has ever been asked to sign an NDA. Ever, Micah Beasley, a campaign spokesperson, said in a statement.
...
The agreement has multiple provisions regarding confidentiality and non-disclosure. It stipulates that, by signing, the employee will not voluntarily disseminate or publish, or cause anyone else to disseminate or publish, in any manner, disparaging, threatening, defamatory, or negative remarks or comments about their employment in Swalwells office or any information learned during that time that is adverse to the interests of Swalwells office or staff.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/10/swalwell-staffer-discrimination-settlement-00867894
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
136 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not saying he is innocent, but I do believe the timing stinks of rat fuckery.
SheltieLover
14 hrs ago
#1
Victims in cases like these will often come forward when they see that someone they know as a predator or pest is about
WhiskeyGrinder
14 hrs ago
#24
That is, indeed, a commonality among sexual assault survivors, but I'm still reserving judgment.
SheltieLover
14 hrs ago
#28
I agree with you. I think everyone involved .. Women, men, witnesses should take a polygraph.
Trueblue1968
11 hrs ago
#92
an ABSOLUTELY common dynamic in sexual assault .. - - - - - - - - - - -(nt)-
stopdiggin
14 hrs ago
#32
"why did you wait ?" is an age old question that has an unfortunate history of being weaponized ....
stopdiggin
14 hrs ago
#31
Fun fact: It was George Conway (the former Mr. Kellyanne Conway) who told E. Jean Carroll to file a suit against T💩p.
OMGWTF
13 hrs ago
#40
Politico says they've seen a written confidentiality and non-disparagement agreement
muriel_volestrangler
13 hrs ago
#50
I am not male & am a strong feminist with a strong bs sniffer & this stinks!
SheltieLover
12 hrs ago
#79
Most of the bottom tier Dems in the race should've pulled out, imo &, in fact that they didn't makes me wonder how many
SheltieLover
11 hrs ago
#94
I don't know either, Jill, but phone numbers can be spoofed and we know ruskies are great at hacking...
SheltieLover
14 hrs ago
#26
I was skeptical about one accuser, as she had a continuing relationship, but with four accusers? Nah, bye Eric
Pompoy
46 min ago
#136
Sometimes Democrats need math lessons OR, they need to think of the party before themselves.
LeftInTX
8 hrs ago
#123
Reason No. I-Lost-Count why victims don't speak out: They're seen as saboteurs.
WhiskeyGrinder
14 hrs ago
#4
If he could up his numbers to double digits he could be a GOP presidential nominee in 2028.
Vinca
14 hrs ago
#16
How many of those Dems have been as vocal as Swalwell against Piggy?
MorbidButterflyTat
13 hrs ago
#51
so all these former Democratic staffers - have reemerged as Republican operatives .. ?
stopdiggin
14 hrs ago
#10
Took 3 weeks and 6 additional women accusing Franken before the calls to resign
EdmondDantes_
14 hrs ago
#38
in Franken's case, Stone definitely got the ball rolling but yes, Franken chose to resign. He wasn't forced out.
LymphocyteLover
13 hrs ago
#43
I don't think so. Think of it as a blessing this came out now and not further down the road.
LymphocyteLover
13 hrs ago
#42
Sigh. So, we're still not believing the women. Political party doesn't matter, it's all about not believing the women.
mucholderthandirt
13 hrs ago
#52
He did apologize to his wife for "past errors" whatever that means. Otherwise it was a denial.
33taw
12 hrs ago
#73
I thought you were going to say how our supposed ally, Israel, is really screwing the USA over and over. My mistake. nt
Exp
12 hrs ago
#77
We should know our candidates better. When they tell you who they are the first time believe them.
Walleye
12 hrs ago
#80
Didn't 16 or 17 women accuse TrumpenFuhrer of the same thing and REPUBLICANS DIDNT CARE???
NoMoreRepugs
12 hrs ago
#86
Yes, if Swalwell is responsible for sexual assault, he needs be held to account
Grim Chieftain
12 hrs ago
#87
If he didn't do anything wrong IMO he should stay in the gov race and immediately file a lawsuit
in2herbs
11 hrs ago
#91
I love the quote, ""Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds / Or bends with the remover to remove."
Martin68
9 hrs ago
#109
Who always benefits from these things? That's where the focus should also be.
live love laugh
8 hrs ago
#116