Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(10,974 posts)
19. Non-partisan is probably a better word for them
Fri Apr 3, 2026, 01:25 PM
Yesterday

They're not entrenched in Red Team vs. Blue Team. So when they vote, it's usually based on whatever is going on at the moment, what's happening with their wallets, what particular brew of policies or perceptions are reigning in their world.

Social media is a terrible place to get a sense of them, because social media are at the heart of the partisan bunker.

I know plenty of non-partisan people - and I'm pretty close to being one myself. Many of them are plenty informed. Just not political junkies (which I'd argue does not mean informed, particularly when that "information" is coming from highly biased sources interested in narrative over facts and context).

There are a lot - a lot - of people who are not very fond of our party who still pull the lever for us. Hell, I'm downright sick and tired of the gerontocratic hierarchy and the inability of a consultant class to just read the fucking rest of the country for once, but here I am voting blue over and over.

And we've not touched on a growing Left of young people who are increasingly disenchanted with the out of touch political class who they mentally file with the billionaires given how much the system benefits them (and their families, cousins, friends, hangers on, etc. No no, they're just really amazing at the stock market, you guys).

They're winnable votes. But our electoral strategy hasn't been geared to winning them. And partisans don't want our strategy to be geared toward that. They want their already-in-the-bag-no-matter-what votes to be the sole arbiter of policy and messaging.

It's working great!

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry I call Bullshit on CNN.. "Lesser of two evils.." Cha Yesterday #1
Hey, Cha. Aloha Pototan Yesterday #4
Oh Mahalo for that Correction, Pototan Cha Yesterday #22
If we don't earn the confidence of these voters, we could still lose in 28. everyonematters Yesterday #8
It's especially disappointing when individuals/groups who are supposed to be our political allies... QueerDuck Yesterday #11
Oh, interesting NJCher Yesterday #2
lol...I'm right there with you, Cher La Coliniere Yesterday #3
Me too! TurboDem Yesterday #5
This is something I relate to. ananda Yesterday #6
The "both sides" birds are singing Walleye Yesterday #7
"Double Haters" are former MAGA cultists who've lost all hope, but still believe they're supposed to Hate "D." sop Yesterday #9
Actually, they are "pure Independents" Pototan Yesterday #10
I've never met a "pure independent" voter. sop Yesterday #14
Most polls refer to this term Pototan Yesterday #15
You're right, most pollsters use that term to describe voters who claim they don't have a party preference. sop Yesterday #17
Non-partisan is probably a better word for them Sympthsical Yesterday #19
"pure independents" are people too self absorbed to stand for a position haele Yesterday #20
Can't that 25% find someone amongst themselves to run for election ToxMarz Yesterday #12
After telling those voters "it's a bus taking you in the direction you want to go, not a marriage!" and "it's WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #13
Because if we take them at their word and believe they have the values they say they do... W_HAMILTON Yesterday #18
Checks and balances Johnny2X2X Yesterday #16
Didn't Trump and republicans win this group last year? fujiyamasan Yesterday #21
Yes Pototan Yesterday #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Double Haters" favor Dem...»Reply #19