Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,688 posts)
37. How do we know he is dead?
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 11:06 PM
17 hrs ago

It could have been done with a squib, the gun loaded with blanks and they planted a bullet to make it look like he was shot
The shooter was paid to confess and promised the case would get tossed.
Kirk is in hiding somewhere

If we are going with crazy theories, let's go all-in

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl 19 hrs ago #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ 19 hrs ago #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II 19 hrs ago #3
Patsy dweller 19 hrs ago #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 19 hrs ago #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave 17 hrs ago #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp 19 hrs ago #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp 18 hrs ago #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 2 hrs ago #59
When I see evidence..... SergeStorms 2 hrs ago #62
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters 18 hrs ago #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan 15 hrs ago #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 3 hrs ago #58
. BootinUp 1 hr ago #63
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants 18 hrs ago #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino 16 hrs ago #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu 19 hrs ago #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that did it stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses 18 hrs ago #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin 18 hrs ago #16
Weird Blue_Roses 18 hrs ago #20
Post removed Post removed 14 hrs ago #47
Oh boy... RockRaven 18 hrs ago #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates 18 hrs ago #12
Exactly right. Straw Man 18 hrs ago #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss 18 hrs ago #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier 17 hrs ago #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 17 hrs ago #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 18 hrs ago #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder 18 hrs ago #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates 18 hrs ago #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder 18 hrs ago #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven 18 hrs ago #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X 17 hrs ago #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 6 hrs ago #52
It's a defense claim Renew Deal 18 hrs ago #22
Now watch them say that Charlie Kirk's bullet matches Luigi Mangione's gun... PeaceWave 18 hrs ago #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 17 hrs ago #28
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion 17 hrs ago #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw 17 hrs ago #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill 17 hrs ago #34
What questions? Aussie105 17 hrs ago #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 6 hrs ago #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka 17 hrs ago #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 6 hrs ago #49
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck 16 hrs ago #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 4 hrs ago #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva 16 hrs ago #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple 15 hrs ago #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian 16 hrs ago #40
Shocking. C Moon 16 hrs ago #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote 15 hrs ago #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian 14 hrs ago #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 7 hrs ago #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 6 hrs ago #51
It was a fragment Historic NY 4 hrs ago #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 2 hrs ago #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 4 hrs ago #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 4 hrs ago #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue 3 hrs ago #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 2 hrs ago #61
Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound 16 min ago #64
I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian 8 min ago #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...»Reply #37