Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rpannier

(24,922 posts)
30. I haven't followed the story much
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 10:30 PM
15 hrs ago

My understanding is the round may have struck something Kirk was wearing and it ricocchet up. If that was true, whatever it hit would have been powerful enough to absorb the impact and force the round up. So whatever it struck would have damaged the round.
For me, Charlie Kirk is gone. That's where the story begins and ends

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl 16 hrs ago #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ 16 hrs ago #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II 16 hrs ago #3
Patsy dweller 16 hrs ago #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 16 hrs ago #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave 15 hrs ago #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp 16 hrs ago #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp 16 hrs ago #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 19 min ago #59
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters 15 hrs ago #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan 13 hrs ago #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 26 min ago #58
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants 15 hrs ago #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino 14 hrs ago #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu 16 hrs ago #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that did it stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses 16 hrs ago #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin 16 hrs ago #16
Weird Blue_Roses 16 hrs ago #20
Post removed Post removed 12 hrs ago #47
Oh boy... RockRaven 16 hrs ago #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates 16 hrs ago #12
Exactly right. Straw Man 16 hrs ago #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss 16 hrs ago #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier 15 hrs ago #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 14 hrs ago #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 16 hrs ago #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder 16 hrs ago #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates 15 hrs ago #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder 15 hrs ago #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven 15 hrs ago #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X 14 hrs ago #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 3 hrs ago #52
It's a defense claim Renew Deal 15 hrs ago #22
Now watch them say that Charlie Kirk's bullet matches Luigi Mangione's gun... PeaceWave 15 hrs ago #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 15 hrs ago #28
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion 15 hrs ago #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw 14 hrs ago #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill 14 hrs ago #34
What questions? Aussie105 14 hrs ago #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 4 hrs ago #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka 14 hrs ago #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 4 hrs ago #49
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck 14 hrs ago #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 1 hr ago #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva 14 hrs ago #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple 12 hrs ago #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian 14 hrs ago #40
Shocking. C Moon 13 hrs ago #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote 12 hrs ago #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian 12 hrs ago #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 5 hrs ago #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 4 hrs ago #51
It was a fragment Historic NY 2 hrs ago #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 18 min ago #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 1 hr ago #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 1 hr ago #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue 46 min ago #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 9 min ago #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...»Reply #30