Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Iran will be another failed state JBTaurus83 Sunday #1
I recently read that Iran's government is actually so 'decentralized' Jack Valentino Sunday #2
they control the population with small arms and other simple brutality bigtree Sunday #5
Trump's hopes of 'regime change' seem dependent on the Iranian citizens themselves, Jack Valentino Sunday #7
in my view bigtree Sunday #11
Maybe someone should inform him about the history of Russia's invasion of Afghanistan--- Jack Valentino Sunday #13
It reminds me H2O Man Yesterday #19
good analogy bigtree Yesterday #21
Peculiar definition of "success" unblock Sunday #3
The Failure of "Success". ForeGoneLegsBirne Yesterday #18
The stupid is strong in that one. Lifeafter70 Sunday #4
How many "sucker and loser" US have thomski64 Sunday #6
This IS the 'Epstein files war'..... nt Jack Valentino Sunday #9
He is playing second fiddle and fails to realize it. David__77 Sunday #8
Criminal Moron in Charge. OAITW r.2.0 Sunday #10
The plan just seems to be Gaza on a bigger scale Johonny Sunday #12
yep bigtree Yesterday #23
if this was a Dem president the MSM would be SCREAMING about this Skittles Yesterday #14
I think it's objective is being misunderstood questionseverything Yesterday #15
insane to say out loud bigtree Yesterday #22
What a ham-fisted hack BaronChocula Yesterday #16
Mulligan? czarjak Yesterday #17
shell game bigtree Yesterday #24
99% of those who read this misunderstand it. WarGamer Yesterday #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump: 'Attack so success...»Reply #9