General Discussion

bigtree

(93,849 posts)

55. the projection here is against Garland

Thu Feb 26, 2026, 01:23 AM

6 hrs ago

...and you got my answer, as if you actually responded to MY query about proof with something substantive, and your answer wasn't void of personalizations, going on about 'unbending loyalty.' Talk about projections.

You dodged providing proof of what you complained about, and now you've moved on to demanding things of me.

Give it up. This convo is toast.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Top Oversight Democrat says Merrick Garland should testify on Epstein [View all] Mr. Sparkle 17 hrs ago OP

Oh BeyondGeography 17 hrs ago #1

DURec leftstreet 17 hrs ago #2

Great idea! And while they're at it, please subpoena whomever at SDNY requested NM to stop ranch investigation in 2019 SheltieLover 17 hrs ago #3

Years of silence Tetrachloride 17 hrs ago #4

Merrick Garland also has standing Mblaze 17 hrs ago #5

Lol. msfiddlestix 17 hrs ago #6

Agree. Spineless weasels like Garland never stand up for anything. BannonsLiver 16 hrs ago #19

he's trying to appear even-handed here bigtree 15 hrs ago #27

Bill Barr needs to be deposed. poli-junkie 17 hrs ago #7

Yes, Barr and Garland both need to testify FakeNoose 16 hrs ago #13

This!!!!! 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 SheltieLover 12 hrs ago #52

Gooooood! Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #8

🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 Whyisthisstillclose 16 hrs ago #9

Merrick Garland would take the 5th... Escape 16 hrs ago #10

Merrick Garland has never and would never take the 5th. SunSeeker 16 hrs ago #12

Thank you. Well said Raven123 15 hrs ago #26

Epstein-related files could not be legally released during Garland's term because Maxwell's case was still under appeal bigtree 16 hrs ago #11

Here comes the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 16 hrs ago #14

There is certainly grounds for criticizing Garland for his slow prosecution of Trump, but not for this. SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #22

I've heard all those excuses and rationalizations before. BannonsLiver 15 hrs ago #24

Those are not "rationalizations" about the handling of the Epstein files, they're facts. SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #39

When Bondi threw Garland's name at Ted Lieu he didn't disagree with her premise that Garland was delinquent on Epstein BeyondGeography 14 hrs ago #41

Ted Lieu was not implying Garland should have disclosed the Epstein files. SunSeeker 13 hrs ago #44

Exactly. Thank you bigtree. He didn't want to comment because it could endanger the conviction, which was on appeal. SunSeeker 16 hrs ago #16

this expectation of some is a degeneration of norms bigtree 15 hrs ago #23

Sounds sorta like can't fight the fire until the house KPN 15 hrs ago #21

I may have a different interpretation of 'still interviewing witnesses' than you bigtree 15 hrs ago #25

There's some management tools called priorities, assignment of resources, KPN 15 hrs ago #28

none of which have been shown by anyone to have been neglected or mismanaged bigtree 15 hrs ago #31

You have your opinion. I have mine. This was a big deal as KPN 15 hrs ago #38

I literally said none was shown bigtree 14 hrs ago #42

You can't show something that is missing -- like higher priority, greater emphasis, etc. I don't isolate everything to KPN 13 hrs ago #45

we're only talking about points and processes of law. What does 'proof' have to do with all that, you say? bigtree 13 hrs ago #48

Instead of escalating and projecting -- as in "obfuscating", KPN 8 hrs ago #54

the projection here is against Garland bigtree 6 hrs ago #55

Mmmhmmm. KPN 6 hrs ago #56

UH OH, Escape 16 hrs ago #15

I like to call it the Garland Society. BannonsLiver 16 hrs ago #18

Yes, and isn't it amazing... Escape 13 hrs ago #46

Interesting question. BannonsLiver 13 hrs ago #49

One million files and nothing was done The Blue Flower 16 hrs ago #17

Incompetence or worse? KPN 15 hrs ago #29

Blaming Biden's DOJ is everywhere on right wing social media. progressoid 16 hrs ago #20

Lol. In some ways, I can't disagree. KPN 15 hrs ago #30

We need to have a GOOD answer to this or it will cost us in the election. Currently our answer is that Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #35

THIS. Absolutely. Shed the thin skin and blinders. KPN 13 hrs ago #47

Instead of wasting time on Garland... appmanga 15 hrs ago #32

This. Good idea. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #34

THIS SunSeeker 15 hrs ago #40

Garland won't tell us anything. Bring on Jack Smith to talk about his investigations. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #33

The deep of corruption in the current and former DOJ is very enlightening. Pretty obvious walkingman 15 hrs ago #36

Brilliant idea xuplate 15 hrs ago #37

Well there's at least one thing MAGAts and Dems appear to agree on MorbidButterflyTat 14 hrs ago #43

It's essentially spring in my area already. BannonsLiver 12 hrs ago #50

So should Barr!!! SheltieLover 12 hrs ago #51

AGREE ! republianmushroom 10 hrs ago #53