Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrickforB

(15,380 posts)
43. Now, think that through for a minute. So you know I am a working economist specializing in economic trends
Thu Feb 5, 2026, 10:45 AM
23 hrs ago

on labor force availability, strength of training pipeline, economic development strategies and how policies affect these things. So I know my shit. I've been doing this upwards of 20 years.

According to the Economic Policy Institute, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) resulted in the displacement of over 879,280 U.S. jobs by 2002. This was largely driven by a growing U.S. trade deficit with Mexico and Canada, which prompted firms to move manufacturing production, especially in the auto and electronics sectors, to lower-wage regions. And again, the agreement provided incentives for U.S. manufacturers to relocate production to Mexico to take advantage of lower labor costs.

See, that is how incentives work. Wall Street knows this so they worked to get Reagan elected, then HW Bush. NAFTA was conceived by the Reagan administration, negotiated by George H.W. Bush, and enacted by Bill Clinton in 1993, with strong backing from economists, multinational corporations, and key leaders in Canada and Mexico. It aimed to eliminate trade barriers, creating a free trade zone to boost economic integration. So it was spoon fed to us as a noble effort to create a worldwide middle class.

But that was actually bullshit, because Wall Street wanted to get away from American labor unions which they felt drove up labor costs excessively. With NAFTA they could move operations to Mexico where workers made pennies on the dollar American workers did.

Cost of goods sold did it. That's a line item in corporate SEC filings, you know. And it is important in every business because every business needs to earn a profit to survive. The problem here is that Wall Street operates on the doctrine of shareholder primacy, which was established in a 1919 MI Supreme Court ruling against Henry Ford in favor of the Dodge brothers, who sued Ford when he gave his workers big raises on the basis that it deprived them of profits to which they were entitled as shareholders. They won, and thus was born the legal doctrine of shareholder primacy.

This means that according to Wall Street fund managers, the 'right thing to do' was to pressure C-suite officers in publicly traded companies to cut cost of sales to boost PROFITS for shareholders. The problem is this is imbalanced because without workers there can be NO profits. But labor is considered a liability, hence the Wall Street fad of driving layoffs to artificially boost quarterly profits.

When NAFTA came along, it forced the market itself to offshore good jobs from America to places like Mexico and other nations further afield. So lots of good jobs in America disappeared over time, replaced by service industry jobs that do not pay nearly as well.

This is why, if you go into the Bureau of Labor Statistics and look at the productivity curve against wages, you will see that heavy automation and technology drove productivity way up while wages remained stagnant.

So, yes NAFTA did in fact hurt the American middle class. Big time. This is why Trump told his supporters that we need tariffs to level the playing field for workers. He was lying of course, but this is why. It was a compelling campaign slogan for people whose fathers and mothers lost their jobs as high-paying middle class jobs in manufacturing went away and they had to take serious downgrades in pay year after year, while prices went up and decreased their purchasing power.

It's the old Wall Street SQUEEZE and it is terrible because greed never rests. This is why we're so fucked now. Wall Street slowly corrupted our politicians so that corporations now pay around 9% of the government's tax revenue while we individuals pay over 80%. In pre-NAFTA days, pre-Reagan Chicago School trickle down economics, this ratio was around 35% corporations to 45% individuals. These policies have shifted the cost of running the American empire squarely on the shoulders of individual taxpayers, while policymakers at the federal level have slowly worked at Wall Street's behest to deregulate, privatize and gut New Deal programs like Social Security. They genuinely believe the market will take care of itself and should be unregulated and 'pure.' The only legitimate reason for the Federal Government to exist is to provide for the common defense. That's it.

Those are the people in power now.

So yes, NAFTA accelerated the demise of America's middle class on the heels of 1) the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, which diluted the power of unions to strike in sympathy with other unions, 2) Lewis Powell's essay, An Attack on American Free Enterprise, which he wrote in 1971 at the behest of the US Chamber of Commerce, and which lays out the plan for a corporate takeover of the republic, which has happened, 3) NAFTA and 4) corporate tax cuts that have proven very damaging to our government's ability to function and certainly to enact and fun policies that actually HELP the middle class.

These idiots have run up a national debt of $35 trillion because you cannot cut taxes for a few rich people and corporations, which limits tax revenue and at the same time fund domestic programs that actually help Americans. That is why we are now being told we cannot 'afford' things like Social Security and Medicare.

I could go on, and in fact could teach a graduate level course on this stuff. NAFTA was not the sole culprit in the killing of the middle class. Rather, it is part of a toxic Wall Street mix that has made the rich richer by stacking the deck against all American wage earners.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

he picked bobby to smear the kennedy name. period. mopinko Wednesday #1
If he tears it down, no way he rebuilds it. Johonny Wednesday #2
His repuke congress will turn the other way and say nothing when he tears it down without their permission. kimbutgar Wednesday #6
Hopefully, we'll have a Dem-led Congress a year from now lanlady Yesterday #39
The White House isn't his either, FoxNewsSucks Wednesday #9
i wonder what else he is going to destroy? MadameButterfly Wednesday #15
I predict that soon to go (if not next) is... Shipwack Wednesday #36
I don't know about objects being purloined from the East wing MadameButterfly Yesterday #41
Conjecture, to be honest. However Shipwack 14 hrs ago #44
Well, we have precedence - what did Congress do when he TBF Wednesday #10
Hope the house changes hands in 2027. Johonny Wednesday #22
When has that ever stopped him from doing any illegal thing he wants to do? efhmc Wednesday #32
Absolutely spot on - thanks for the post. n/t iluvtennis Wednesday #3
You have got to read the whole article. It's beautiful. Ray Bruns Wednesday #4
Kinda like the white house mdbl Wednesday #25
Yup. It goes back to NYC society snubbing him. He never got over it. Joinfortmill Wednesday #5
Also here: https://www.salon.com/2026/02/04/kennedy-center-teaches-maga-a-tough-lesson/ the nelm Wednesday #7
Thanks. Brilliant writer. Pinback 23 hrs ago #42
Perfect! mysteryowl Wednesday #8
I read it and also picked out this part as absolutely crucial Prairie Gates Wednesday #11
Anger that people won't laugh at fart jokes leftstreet Wednesday #18
Don't leave out the credit. The author is Amanda Marcotte JHB Wednesday #12
An aging, decrepit, demented senile fool......... AZ8theist Wednesday #13
Kids have more sense. Woodwizard Wednesday #14
But wait... THERE'S MORE!! QueerDuck Wednesday #16
DURec leftstreet Wednesday #17
ETTD. nt wiggs Wednesday #19
Next the oaf will be dictating to restaurants that they can't serve foods of which he doesn't approve, Totally Tunsie Wednesday #20
REPUBLICANS are obsessed with the Kennedys' greatness and live love laugh Wednesday #21
Kennedy Center Withdrawals gfarber Wednesday #23
I want to formulate a thoughtful reply. This is a good post as far as it goes, but here's the thing: PatrickforB Wednesday #24
Bravo! Well written. padfun Yesterday #37
Thank you, thank you, thank you EverHopeful Yesterday #38
NAFTA OhioBack2Blue Yesterday #40
Now, think that through for a minute. So you know I am a working economist specializing in economic trends PatrickforB 23 hrs ago #43
If only magats weren't incapable of (or is it indifferent to) Six117 Wednesday #26
This is perfectly on target. love_katz Wednesday #27
Where's the "lesson?" NM Grins Wednesday #28
What's the "tough lesson?" Grins Wednesday #29
And when some MAGA jerk "gets their ass handed to them," or if they they get "torn a new ass"... QueerDuck Wednesday #30
maga wouldn't, couldn't, didn't learn anything ToxMarz Wednesday #31
Brilliant, Comprehensive Diagnosis of the Sick Perverted PEDO Cha Wednesday #33
Wow. Thank you, Jack Schlossberg. sheshe2 Wednesday #34
I knew you would like it, she💙 Cha Wednesday #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is🤣and spot ...»Reply #43