General Discussion

ecstatic

(34,929 posts)

24. No way. The real killers overplayed their hand this time

Thu Sep 11, 2025, 11:55 AM

Thursday

I do not believe that for one second.

We have to think about who had a motive in this situation.

Is the Epstein situation removed from the headlines now? I haven't turned on the news today. I assume it's either 9/11 tributes or CK coverage.

From my understanding, CK mentioned that he was being seriously threatened by other republicans for bringing a guy named Dave Smith onto his podcast (Smith was advocating for an end to the Israel/Gaza conflict).

There's also the matter of his wavering back and forth about the Epstein files. Did CK privately confront trump and ask for access to the files in order to be able to get back on the trump train with a clear conscience? Did a deadline pass without access to the files? By offing CK, trump could kill 5 birds with one stone - 1) escape CK's deadline about the epstein files, 2) change the subject with the media, 3) create a martyr, 4) a pretext to start rounding up trans, 5) a pretext to start rounding up people on the left (or block the left's access to guns).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

PittBlue marble falls wave_maker Wednesdays StarryNite AloeVera

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And so it begins-LIVE Ammunition in Kirk Shooting Engraved with Transgender, Antifascist Ideology MAY BE INCORRECT [View all] Just_Vote_Dem Thursday OP

False Flag JustAnotherGen Thursday #1

Looking more likely all the time Attilatheblond Thursday #9

Yeah, right. I've got a cool bridge to sell them. Coventina Thursday #2

Be careful with that deed! Attilatheblond Thursday #4

AROUND her neck would be more fitting Jilly_in_VA Thursday #16

Better hope no undocumented workers built that bridge! marble falls Thursday #30

Yeah, right. Solly Mack Thursday #3

Who didn't see this coming malaise Thursday #5

Yep, copying the Nazi playbook almost to a T n/t Just_Vote_Dem Thursday #10

Crumbs to feed the beasts newdeal2 Thursday #6

Yes it's dangerous D. Spaulding Thursday #13

Crumbs? a slab of raw meat. marble falls Thursday #29

This is some... FalloutShelter Thursday #7

So Trans and Antifa Alenne Thursday #8

Trying to recall... Attilatheblond Thursday #12

It's definitely convenient nt herding cats Thursday #14

Because it is malaise Thursday #41

Here's the excerpt herding cats Thursday #11

Absolute horse shit Takket Thursday #22

Those were my first questions when I read this. herding cats Thursday #25

Was the towel monogrammed? StarryNite Thursday #45

The Minnesota school shooter had all sorts of weird stuff on their ammo. Shooter hated everyone and everything. LeftInTX Thursday #52

Bad movie plot... PCIntern Thursday #15

It's probably a fake anyway Jilly_in_VA Thursday #17

So the shooter ran away wotj a rifle in their johnnyfins Thursday #18

A question for those who know ammunition: jeffreyi Thursday #19

Yes Greg_In_SF Thursday #21

Would not an alteration affect the flight path? Turbineguy Thursday #48

The engraving would be on the casing, not the projectile. rickford66 Thursday #60

Well, 1 - consider the source. 2 - consider who's in charge of the FBI. Initech Thursday #20

as I've said before.....WE WILL NEVER KNOW THE TRUTH WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION!!!!! They lie about a kennedy Thursday #23

And I have this gut feeling they will use yesterday's tragedy to do something extremely terrifying. Initech Thursday #33

No way. The real killers overplayed their hand this time ecstatic Thursday #24

This is the person that just blended into a conservative college campus? 33taw Thursday #26

This is definitely odd. everyonematters Thursday #27

Do not buy that crap for a milisecond. marble falls Thursday #28

Nonsense. 2MuchNoise Thursday #31

Why does the FBI have jurisdiction here? PurgedVoter Thursday #32

What I don't get about these "engraved bullets (or casings) Bluetus Thursday #34

Brief answer to your question. Hellbound Hellhound Thursday #38

We are all Emmanuel Goldstein now. Basso8vb Thursday #35

So is George Soros's name also on them? NBachers Thursday #36

Heh. My question also. yellowcanine Thursday #66

"that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out muriel_volestrangler Thursday #37

Thank you! I just saw this too Just_Vote_Dem Thursday #39

This message was self-deleted by its author roamer65 Thursday #40

They got that info from Transphobe Nancy Mace mcar Thursday #42

It's a confusing sentence. herding cats Thursday #44

But the damage is done mcar Thursday #55

Most definitely. herding cats Thursday #56

Nancy Mace is the source?! yardwork Thursday #43

The source is the Wall Street Journal muriel_volestrangler Thursday #58

I see. But now the WSJ is walking back the claim? yardwork Thursday #61

I don't know what the WSJ is now saying - a lot of their stuff is paywalled muriel_volestrangler Thursday #63

To be fair leaking this information would surely damage the case. joshcryer Thursday #46

Right. MorbidButterflyTat Thursday #62

If true superpatriotman Thursday #47

They know its true maxrandb Thursday #49

Are these words For or Against these adjectives? mackdaddy Thursday #50

The popular "It could fit on the rifle butt" excuse will need an update Torchlight Thursday #51

Engraved ammo huh? Was he sniping with a 20mm anti-aircraft gun? Ping Tung Thursday #53

In our media environment, the first disinformation put out is the one most people will remember. sop Thursday #54

Doesn't matter. They put it out on the internet and Ilsa Thursday #57

This has FSB written all over it. Crunchy Frog Thursday #59

"Was likely a lie" is more correct. yellowcanine Thursday #64

People are releasing AI enhanced pics of the shooter. Mosby Thursday #65

Regardless if this is real or not, I hope everyone understands that trans people are just like everyone else. Oneironaut Thursday #67

I saw it in the NY Times. Sparkly Thursday #68

Bumping this up to say that the WAPO has retracted its irresponsible report on this matter Takket Thursday #69

'May be incorrect' ??? Yeah, no kidding? Jack Valentino Thursday #70