Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(6,341 posts)

8. I think it's by design. Boils down to

Wed Sep 3, 2025, 08:36 PM

Wednesday

essentially what you said: "because we said so." Pretense at jurisprudence or even precedent, be damned.

Essentially thugs in robes, imo.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

These MAGA justices are letting Trump get away with murder [View all] B.See Tuesday OP

You'd no doubt know better than I. B.See Tuesday #2

If SCOTUS decides either "A" or "B" but don't explain why, no_hypocrisy Tuesday #3

Yes, I know the shadow docket rulings B.See Tuesday #4

Temporary in the sense that the next SCOTUS could rule 180 degrees from no_hypocrisy Wednesday #5

Oh I see. Then B.See Wednesday #6

YW. You'd think with all those law clerks from Harvard and Yale, no_hypocrisy Wednesday #7

I think it's by design. Boils down to B.See Wednesday #8