Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Deadline: Legal Blog-Trump wants to file a Supreme Court petition in E. Jean Carroll case this fall [View all]
Lawyers representing the president want until Nov. 10 to file their petition challenging a lower court ruling in Carroll’s favor.
Trump wants to file a Supreme Court petition in E. Jean Carroll case this fall - MSNBC
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2025-09-03T21:56:06.305Z
apple.news/Ajr3BoZimQdW...
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/e-jean-carroll-trump-appeal-supreme-court-rcna228869
The president’s lawyers said they intend to file a petition asking the justices to hear their bid to reverse an appeals court ruling in favor of E. Jean Carroll, the writer whom Trump was found to have sexually abused and defamed. Carroll won two similar civil cases against Trump: one that’s pending in the appeals court in which she won an $83.3 million defamation award, and another in which she won $5 million.
The latter case is the subject of Trump’s forthcoming Supreme Court petition, which will challenge an appeals court ruling against him. In an Aug. 27 filing, his lawyers asked for permission to extend their filing deadline from Sept. 11 to Nov. 10.
Extensions are normal in Supreme Court practice, and in the likely event that this one is granted, that wouldn’t signal that the court will necessarily agree to hear Trump’s appeal. It’s more of an administrative request simply to give his lawyers more time to file the petition. After they do, Carroll’s lawyers can file a brief opposing review, and then the court will decide whether to take it up. It takes four justices to agree to grant review.
“President Trump has consistently and unequivocally denied Carroll’s allegations in both cases,” his filing said. It didn’t fully lay out his forthcoming legal arguments (those will come in the petition), but it said his lawyers intend to raise issues involving how different courts of appeals address evidentiary issues. Parties seeking high court review often tell the justices that review is needed to resolve splits among lower courts around the country.
The latter case is the subject of Trump’s forthcoming Supreme Court petition, which will challenge an appeals court ruling against him. In an Aug. 27 filing, his lawyers asked for permission to extend their filing deadline from Sept. 11 to Nov. 10.
Extensions are normal in Supreme Court practice, and in the likely event that this one is granted, that wouldn’t signal that the court will necessarily agree to hear Trump’s appeal. It’s more of an administrative request simply to give his lawyers more time to file the petition. After they do, Carroll’s lawyers can file a brief opposing review, and then the court will decide whether to take it up. It takes four justices to agree to grant review.
“President Trump has consistently and unequivocally denied Carroll’s allegations in both cases,” his filing said. It didn’t fully lay out his forthcoming legal arguments (those will come in the petition), but it said his lawyers intend to raise issues involving how different courts of appeals address evidentiary issues. Parties seeking high court review often tell the justices that review is needed to resolve splits among lower courts around the country.
trump got his butt kicked in the trial court and there are jury findings that will be hard to overcome.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read