General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The attacks on Ali Velshi's monologue yesterday - "Where's the Party?" are out of line. [View all]BaronChocula
(3,263 posts)There are no practical specifics of what X Democrat SHOULD be doing (unless it's a suggestion of what Democrats already have been doing).
I think the "Where's the party" crowd are frustrated like the rest of us, but wish we had someone like trump from 2021-2024 who was a "party leader" because he led a cult. I don't want a friggin' cult. I want a party and the reality is when a party is out of power THERE IS NO NOMINAL SINGLE LEADER. What we have is a party of leaders coast to coast standing up at every level from small towns to Texas legislatures to the senate floor (and it's Cory Booker, not Corey Booker as typed in the op).
In his long-winded monolog, Velshi pointed to the fighters in the party "out there." He pointed to Iowa for electing a Democratic state senator (in an election that could not have been won without Democratic leadership), Democrats in the Texas legislature, Gov Newsom, Gov Pritzker, Bernie Sanders, AOC, The Two Tennessee Justins, etc. yet failed to realize and acknowledge THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE FOR DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP AT THE MOMENT.
I understand not being a total fan of Chuck Schumer. I can understand questioning the motives of Hakeem Jeffries, but they are only congressional leaders and finger-pointing them for not coordinating a nationwide point-by-point agenda to stop a democratically elected authoritarian certainly isn't what anyone should expect them to do. Do I miss Harry Reid at a time like this? Absolutely, but would he be able to live up to what the "Where's the party" crowd are expecting? No.
I understand Club Velshi because we're all frustrated, but in order to move on I think we need to be realistic about expecting a singular armored Democrat on a horse with a one-size-fits-all war plan.
Edit history
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):