Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Volaris

(10,974 posts)

7. No, the US Court of international trade? said congress has to approve,

Reply to bucolic_frolic (Reply #4)

Thu May 29, 2025, 12:13 PM

May 29

Or something to that effect. This is trump being pissy about a 'lower' court decision he doesn't like, so now he's gonna go whine to Sammy.

If I were The Chief, and I had decided that the administration were in contempt, part of the 'enforcement' would be a public statement that the high court simply isn't going to hear anything trump brings to them (all lower court decisions stand with no SC review) until they've put themselves back in compliance.

Completely legal, and not a fucking thing King Shortfingers can do about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Per Bloomberg TV: US says it may ask Supreme Court Friday to keep tariffs intact. [View all] JohnSJ May 29 OP

Not at all surprised. He may be surprised at that outcome, though. OLDMDDEM May 29 #1

Krasnov (R) must krap again on America BoRaGard May 29 #2

Not at all. This is why they keep stealing national elections, to appoint people to scRotus SheltieLover May 29 #3

And to appoint Judges at all federal courts thought crime May 29 #5

Absoloutely! SheltieLover May 29 #6

Is he afraid these could be illegal unofficial acts? bucolic_frolic May 29 #4

No, the US Court of international trade? said congress has to approve, Volaris May 29 #7