Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

wishstar

(5,747 posts)

1. Basically yes, on July 1st SC ruled that he has blanket immunity for "official"acts

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Tue May 27, 2025, 06:41 PM

May 27

but does not have immunity for "unofficial" acts while President.

So anything that can be considered officially part of his actions as President are considered immune because of the SC ruling.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When DC Circuit court ruled, last summer, the piece of shit does NOT have blanket immunity [View all] Eliot Rosewater May 27 OP

Basically yes, on July 1st SC ruled that he has blanket immunity for "official"acts wishstar May 27 #1

Sadly they didn't define "Official Acts" dickthegrouch May 27 #2

Just as I feared, corrupt politicians, pretending to be justices Eliot Rosewater May 28 #3

I wonder if one can be immune dickthegrouch May 28 #4

That's their out newdeal2 May 28 #5