Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

paleotn

(20,657 posts)

11. And if they did rule contempt, who exactly would enforce it?

Reply to LymphocyteLover (Reply #8)

Sun May 25, 2025, 09:17 AM

May 25

No one.

I do agree on the elections, however. There will be elections in 2026. Fair elections in blue states. And a host of new Dems will be elected. But their election will be called fraudulent by the regime, even though it wasn't of course. But that doesn't matter. House Republicans and Speaker "Jebus" Johnson will be pressured not to seat them, and they will cave. Cave isn't the right word for most of them as they're in on the coup. Following orders is a better fit.

Our democracy is on life support and congressional Republicans might just "pull the plug" in Jan. 2027.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rampartd Seinan Sensei raging moderate

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Page 562 of the House Bill!!! [View all] RoeVWade May 25 OP

Does being as unconstitutional as the poll tax matter? No, not in today's U.S.. We've gone backwards. Justice and access artemisia1 May 25 #1

The provision is unwise and should be defeated but its not an unconstitutional "poll tax" onenote May 25 #10

...the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances... Xipe Totec May 25 #12

Thanks. You raise a good point and I've modified my post accordingly. onenote May 25 #13

Look at Trump's Memorandum: "Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c)" sop May 25 #2

EVERYTHING is transactional... GiqueCee May 25 #5

Yep, that's what's in the bill... their complaint about lawsuits is such noxious BS. These people LymphocyteLover May 25 #7

it's sick and fascist but OTOH, Federal courts haven't yet issued any contempt citations LymphocyteLover May 25 #3

Oh it's a big deal Tickle May 25 #4

I understand that. But again, the courts are simply not issuing contempt citations LymphocyteLover May 25 #8

And if they did rule contempt, who exactly would enforce it? paleotn May 25 #11

Civil contempt is self-enforcing liberalgunwilltravel May 25 #15

"And if they did rule contempt, who exactly would enforce it?" CaptainTruth May 25 #17

You might want to start looking for some faith, then... OldBaldy1701E May 26 #22

Buh bye RandiFan1290 May 29 #24

This provision, and probably many others, may run afoul of the "Byrd Rule" Klondike Kat May 25 #6

I wonder...at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire, were there those who grasped elocs May 25 #9

Hard to say since crystal balls are in such short supply. paleotn May 25 #14

and of course it is retroactive. Native May 25 #16

"If you aren't cheating, you're not trying." czarjak May 25 #18

Unprecedented my ass... 2naSalit May 25 #19

"Conservative" Dystopia. Happy to rule over embers if it hurts Liberals. BurnDoubt May 26 #20

This has nothing to do with the budget and should not be in a reconciliation bill! SunSeeker May 26 #21

so good markie May 26 #23