Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Seeing people use AI to post to DU is weird [View all]Hassin Bin Sober
(27,084 posts)92. Like this?
Identifying AI-generated content, especially text and images, can be tricky. Here's a guide to spotting AI-generated materials:
1. Textual Content:
AI Detection Tools:
Utilize online tools like QuillBot, Grammarly, and GPTZero to assess the likelihood of AI authorship.
Sentence Structure and Style:
AI-generated text often has repetitive structures, overly formal tones, and a lack of nuanced language. Look for excessive use of jargon or generic vocabulary.
Inconsistencies and Lack of Detail:
AI can struggle with context and may produce nonsensical sentences, or fail to provide concrete examples or supporting arguments.
Quick Responses:
AI can generate responses quickly, while humans often take time to formulate their thoughts.
2. Visual Content (Images and Videos):
Unusual Details:
AI-generated images can exhibit unusual or inconsistent details like asymmetrical facial features, odd finger placement, or objects with strange proportions.
Texture and Pattern Issues:
AI may struggle with complex textures or patterns, leading to repetitions or awkward transitions in textures like hair, skin, or clothing.
Lighting and Shadows:
Look for inconsistent or unrealistic lighting and shadows.
Background Anomalies:
AI images may have backgrounds that appear unrealistic or inconsistent with the scene.
Facial Expressions:
AI-generated faces might have expressions that don't align with the overall mood or emotion of the image.
Reverse Image Search:
Use tools like Google Images to search for the origin of the image and potentially identify AI-generated content through hashtags or source names.
Digital Artifacts:
Look for pixelation, strange color patterns, or blur in areas where it shouldn't logically be.
Unnatural Movements and Expressions:
AI videos may show jerky movements, stiffness, or facial expressions that seem off.
3. Other Indicators:
Lack of Real-World Understanding:
AI-generated content might lack a grasp of the broader context or specific details, and may make claims that don't align with reality.
Monotonous Tone and Flawless Grammar:
While AI-generated text can be grammatically perfect, it often has a robotic or monotonous tone.
Examine for Artifacts:
Zooming in on AI-generated images can reveal inconsistencies, misplaced shapes, or stray pixels.
4. Fact-Checking:
DW News Fact Check:
.
Use sources like DW News to learn how to spot AI-generated videos, particularly during breaking news events.
Don't Overly Rely on "How to Spot AI" Guides:
.
Be cautious of guides that promise easy identification, as these may be AI-generated themselves.
You can watch this video to learn how to tell if an image is fake content from AI:
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

So far, I am blissfully, ignoring the idea of AI. I guess it will intrude on my life eventually.
Walleye
May 23
#2
It's the next step in dumbing down people. Give them poor education first.
mucholderthandirt
Saturday
#114
I teach high school English. The marked lack of "the" is also a give away.
Cuthbert Allgood
May 23
#95
You make a good point--those are definitely some telltale signs of AI-generated text.
Abolishinist
May 23
#27
Careful! The tit-ular head of DHS will be coming for you - in the famous leather suit.
erronis
May 23
#42
Agreed. It's kind of clunky. Feels artificial. Hard to put a finger on but feels off.
paleotn
May 23
#43
I appreciate posts which cite credible sources, not those which paste AI scrawls.
John1956PA
May 23
#5
Yes!! That is what drew me to DU, factual statements with cites. It's a dying art I guess. nt
SunSeeker
May 23
#37
what if it was a stated rule (at DU), like "No AI-generated material," but kind of on the honor system?
Alice Kramden
May 23
#105
I think it is worse than weird, especially when not labelled explicitly as AI generated. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 23
#31
It's great for people with learning disabilities that make spelling challenging.
David__77
May 23
#57
I use A1 to evaluate my postings on different forums to see how accurate A1 thinks about what I'm thinking ...
aggiesal
May 23
#58
A1 sauce will jam up your keyboard, which you will have to replace because you can't clean it
Bernardo de La Paz
May 23
#83
You didn't consider that I used A1 sarcastically? I thought that was obvious. ...
aggiesal
May 23
#88
Sorry, I missed that it was sarcasm. My reply was a bit "tongue in cheek", yes. All good, thanks. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 23
#91
LLMs - generative AI tools - are unethical, illegally trained tools that no one with any respect for
highplainsdem
May 23
#71
could that kind of AI fake converstation be flagged for violation of Du rules?
Alice Kramden
May 23
#103
All of that is part of the misinformation/disinformation arena, some of which is spewed out here.
Celerity
May 23
#85
I want to know if I'm dealing with an entity that cares what I say. By "care" I mean...
LAS14
May 23
#101
I thought I had one place that was safe from "AI" stupidity. Seems I was wrong.
mucholderthandirt
Saturday
#113
It might be prevalent with trolls but I can't picture a regular poster going through
ecstatic
Sunday
#128