Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dickthegrouch

(4,101 posts)

6. Do we know who the SCROTUS 6's law clerks are?

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Fri May 23, 2025, 04:51 PM

May 23

They should be named for posterity since they are currently being groomed, and we'll need to know who to avoid appointing to other judicial positions umpty years down the line.

If they are writing this kind of opinion without apparent protest (i.e.resigning) they are useless (and probably as corrupt) as their principals.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court Really Expects You to Take This Craven Horseshit Seriously - Jay Willis [View all] In It to Win It May 23 OP

A future Democratic president should claim SCOTUS judges are agency heads. bucolic_frolic May 23 #1

They have the notorious "SC6" tattoo on on their knuckles Ponietz May 23 #4

They LOOK lazier and stupider than ever before, too. dchill May 23 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz May 23 #3

If the board members in question were wealthy and white the moniss May 23 #5

Do we know who the SCROTUS 6's law clerks are? dickthegrouch May 23 #6