Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Autumn

(47,910 posts)

4. Tell that to the Pentagon Warnok. They seem to think that Emoluments Clause

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Original post)

Fri May 23, 2025, 09:21 AM

May 23

is just a suggestion. Are any of you Dems gonna do anything about them accepting it on Dipshits behalf? They seem to think we taxpayers should be on the hook for a billion dollars to make the guilded flying whore house safe for him to own.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BeerBarrelPolka UTUSN

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sen Warnock: And you see why we have an Emoluments Clause in the first place. [View all] Dennis Donovan May 22 OP

Used to have an emoluments clause... MiHale May 22 #1

Yeah, was going to say - So why have it if it's de facto ignored? UTUSN May 22 #2

Previously it was up to Congress Rhiannon12866 May 23 #3

Tell that to the Pentagon Warnok. They seem to think that Emoluments Clause Autumn May 23 #4

They "think"? - They're just following orders. UTUSN May 23 #6

Everyone musr bring a little model airplane Johonny May 23 #5