Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Snoopy 7

(673 posts)
5. wow
Fri May 23, 2025, 06:18 AM
May 23

I guess it's time to revisit history:
In a June 2024 ruling, the Supreme Court clarified that a federal bribery law, 18 U.S.C. § 666, does not criminalize "gratuities" given to state and local officials after an official action, according to the American Bar Association. The court's decision, in Snyder v. United States, focused on distinguishing between bribes, which are payments made before an official act to influence it, and gratuities, which are payments made after the action as a form of thanks or reward. The ruling effectively narrowed the scope of Section 666, which was often used by federal prosecutors to pursue corruption cases against state and local officials.
This means if the bribe comes after the awarded act then it isn't a bribe but a tip therefore, these people are looking to get their "tips" tax free. Who would have thunk it?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tips non tax on tips is f...»Reply #5