Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Disaffected

(5,594 posts)
1. There is a caveat however.
Thu May 22, 2025, 07:29 PM
Thursday

If "security" is given by the plaintiff (to cover defendant's costs if the injunction or TRO is later overturned on appeal), then the injunction or TRO can be ordered (as I understand it). How much of an improvement that is in practice remains a question however.

Here's the text of the bill:

“No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued….”

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hidden in the Big Beautif...»Reply #1